- Associated Press - Wednesday, August 27, 2014

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) - The state of Ohio acted legally in withholding records documenting threats against Republican Gov. John Kasich from a political blogger who requested them, the Ohio Supreme Court decided Wednesday.

In an unsigned opinion, the high court rejected the Democratic-leaning blog Plunderbund’s arguments that the state Public Safety Department had improperly denied its request for public records under a “security records” exception to state law.

“(A) public office cannot function without the employees and agents who work in that office, and records ‘directly used for protecting or maintaining the security of a public office’ must inevitably include those that are directly used for protecting and maintaining the security of the employees and other officers of that office,” the opinion said.

Plunderbund’s attorney said his client will ask the court to reconsider. Kasich’s office declined comment.

Attorneys for the state argued in the case that Ohio public-records law clearly allows records of threats against Kasich to be shielded from public view for the governor’s protection,

Plunderbund contended security records only include those records created to protect the physical facilities of the governor’s office.

The blog initially sought investigation files on any threats to Kasich or his staff from the Public Safety Department in 2012. Shortly before the request, Kasich’s office cited a large number of threats against the governor as a basis for declining to release daily schedules to the state Democratic Party. The blog wanted to find out the nature of the threats.

It remains unclear whether the referenced threats were tied to large labor protests that had been staged against Kasich in 2011 during a battle over bargaining limits for public-employee unions. The fight ended in a new state law being overturned.

During oral arguments, Plunderbund attorney Victoria Ullmann cited as evidence of the state’s overly broad use of the law that the state continued to deny access to the threat records even after the blog’s reporter repeatedly narrowed his request to include only a description of each threat.

The state’s attorney told justices that Ohio public-records law makes clear the government can shield such records from public view for Kasich’s protection - and that means the entire investigative file, including the threat itself.

To settle the issue, the court hinged Wednesday’s decision in part on affidavits submitted by several experts, including state Public Safety Director John Born and Ohio’s Highway Patrol superintendent and homeland security director, which persuaded justices that releasing records sought by Plunderbund would indeed pose a security threat to the governor. Justice Sharon Kennedy recused herself from the case.

Ullmann said her motion for reconsideration will note that Plunderbund was not given any chance to cross-examine those officials.

The decision comes as Kasich’s rival in the November governor’s race, Cuyahoga County executive Ed FitzGerald, has been sued by the Ohio Republican Party over his refusal to release county records detailing his comings and goings from government buildings and parking facilities. He has also cited security.

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide