- Associated Press - Thursday, July 17, 2014

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) - The drugs and procedures used to execute a death row inmate in a botched lethal injection in April do not risk violating the constitutional rights of other prisoners awaiting execution, attorneys for the state of Oklahoma argue.

In a response filed late Wednesday in federal court in Oklahoma City, the attorney general’s office also maintains the lawsuit filed on behalf of 21 death row inmates is premature and should be stayed since the state’s execution protocols are currently under review and subject to change.

The inmates are seeking to halt any attempt to execute them using the state’s current lethal injection protocols, which they allege present a risk of severe pain and suffering in violation of the U.S. Constitution. But the state said in its filing that all but the three death row plaintiffs currently scheduled to be executed - Charles Warner, Richard Glossip and John Grant - should be dismissed from the case.

“While plaintiffs will eventually be executed, there is no certain, great, or actual threat that they will be executed under the same protocol that currently exists,” Assistant Attorneys General John Hadden and Aaron Stewart wrote.

The inmates’ lawsuit followed the state’s botched April 29 execution of Clayton Lockett using a new three-drug method. Lockett writhed on the gurney, moaned and clenched his teeth for several minutes, and his execution was halted after a doctor determined there was a problem with a single IV in Lockett’s groin. He was pronounced dead about 43 minutes after the execution began.

Gov. Mary Fallin has ordered an independent investigation into Lockett’s botched execution, and prisons director Robert Patton has previously suggested Oklahoma’s lethal injection protocols need to be revised. The investigation, which is being conducted by the Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, is ongoing.

Along with Patton, defendants include Oklahoma State Penitentiary warden Anita Trammell, members of the Board of Corrections and the anonymous participants in the execution - including the doctor inside the death chamber, the paramedic charged with inserting the IVs and the three executioners who administer the lethal drugs.

Attorneys for the state also asked the court to dismiss all of the defendants except for Patton and Trammell, saying the rest are “duplicative, irrelevant, and repetitive.”

The state denies it is violating the inmates’ rights by refusing to disclose the source of the drugs.

The inmates’ lawsuit says that Trammell and Patton inappropriately closed the blinds during Lockett’s execution to prevent witnesses from seeing the final minutes of Lockett’s execution. The state denied that and said the two “exercised their discretion.”


Follow Sean Murphy at www.twitter.com/apseanmurphy

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2021 The Washington Times, LLC.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide