- Associated Press - Thursday, July 17, 2014

GREAT FALLS, Mont. (AP) - A Great Falls man must testify at his deliberate homicide trial if he wants to argue he shot a Fairfield man in self-defense, the Montana Supreme Court has ruled.

Tuesday’s ruling came in the case of Martin Lau, who is charged in the August 2012 death of Don Kline at the Teton County residence Kline shared with Susan Pfeifer

The justices ruled Lau had to testify in order to argue that he shot Kline because Kline was threatening both he and Pfeifer and that Pfeifer had previously told him that Kline had been abusing her, the Great Falls Tribune (https://gftrib.com/1wzFXG2 ) reported Thursday.

Lau’s attorney, Kenneth Olson, had sought to make the self-defense claim by introducing into evidence the prepared statement Lau provided to investigators. A District Court judge agreed in a pretrial ruling.

Prosecutors appealed, arguing District Judge Robert Olson’s ruling unjustly shielded Lau’s version of events from scrutiny.

Attorney Kenneth Olson argued prosecutors were trying to force his client to testify. The Supreme Court ruled the unsworn statement is inadmissible hearsay unless prosecutors can question Lau under oath.

The rules of evidence prohibit the admission of hearsay, unless some exception applies, the justices wrote.

The Teton County clerk of court’s office said it was awaiting formal receipt of the Supreme Court ruling before scheduling a trial date.

___

Information from: Great Falls Tribune, https://www.greatfallstribune.com

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide