- The Washington Times - Monday, June 23, 2014

The Supreme Court on Monday rolled back part of the Obama administration effort to force power plants and factories to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

The justices ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency lacks authority to require some companies draft new plans for cutting emissions of carbon dioxide as part of the permitting process for expanding facilities or building new ones.

The ruling affects the Obama administration’s only program currently in place to cut power plant emissions of carbon dioxide. But it does not affect a more ambitious programs the White House announced this month to cut emissions of carbon dioxide form new power plants by 30 percent by 2030.

EPA is getting almost everything it wanted in this case,” Justice Antonin Scalia wrote in the 5-4 decision.

He said the agency will still be able to regulate 83 percent of the sources responsible for greenhouse gas emissions, though not the 86 percent the EPA wanted to regulate.

Still, the decision represented a moral victory for the energy industry.

Justice Scalia said that approving the authority the EPA had claimed “would contradict the principle that Congress, not the president, makes the law, and would undermine the separation of powers that is crucial to our constitutional system of government.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide