- Associated Press - Tuesday, September 23, 2014

LIVINGSTON, La. (AP) - A state judge has refused to recuse the Livingston Parish District Attorney’s Office’s from prosecuting the case against a contractor accused of overbilling for work after Hurricane Gustav.

Corey Delahoussaye said the DA’s Office should be prohibited from prosecuting him because an assistant district attorney previously gave him legal advice on issues related to his contract with the parish.

Livingston Parish hired Delahoussaye’s firm, C-Del Inc., in October 2009 to help resolve wetlands permit and mitigation issues lingering from the parish’s cleanup efforts after Hurricane Gustav. The Parish Council terminated its contract in August 2011 after raising concerns about the firm’s $2 million in invoices.

The Advocate reports (https://bit.ly/1skRxbw) Judge Brenda Ricks said Monday that she found no reason to recuse the District Attorney’s Office from the case.

Delahoussaye’s attorney, John McLindon, said he would likely ask the 1st Circuit Court of Appeal to review the ruling.

McLindon had argued in July that the entire office should be recused because then-parish legal adviser Blayne Honeycutt, an appointed assistant district attorney, gave Delahoussaye legal advice on numerous occasions. Honeycutt and District Attorney Scott Perrilloux also might be necessary witnesses at trial, he said.

The rules of professional conduct require the recusal of the entire District Attorney’s Office if any of its members has a conflict of interest, McLindon said.

Assistant District Attorney Greg Murphy argued that Honeycutt was never Delahoussaye’s attorney and, even if he had been, the information Honeycutt gained from him was not used in issuing his charges.

Leaving court Monday, Delahoussaye said he was “very disappointed” in the ruling.

“I thought the evidence (for recusal) was overwhelming,” he said.

Perrilloux disagreed, saying in a telephone interview that Delahoussaye’s motion was unfounded and simply a delay tactic.

“If he truly feels like he has a defense, it shouldn’t matter who’s prosecuting him,” Perrilloux said.

Perrilloux’s office filed an 81-count bill of information against Delahoussaye in December after a parish grand jury declined to indict him on allegations he falsified timesheets and billing invoices submitted to the parish. The grand jury vote was 8-2, one vote shy of the nine needed for indictment.

Delahoussaye, who pleaded not guilty on all counts, has called his prosecution “malicious.” He said the District Attorney’s Office, as well as the parish president and council, became hostile toward him after he reported allegedly improper and illegal debris removal work following the 2008 storm.

Delahoussaye was accused of playing golf, working out at a health club and taking his children to swim meets during times he claimed to have been working for the parish.


Information from: The Advocate, https://theadvocate.com

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide