- Associated Press - Monday, July 20, 2015

HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - The state Supreme Court has ruled a judge was within her rights to bar testimony about the unreliability of eyewitnesses from a robbery trial.

Attorneys for Stanley Williams wanted to present testimony from a memory expert during his 2010 trial to support Williams’ defense that he was misidentified as the suspect in the robberies of a Waterbury liquor store and clothing outlet in 2009.

But Superior Court Judge Juliett Crawford ruled that because one of the witnesses had recognized Williams as a regular customer, the testimony would not be relevant.

The high court, in a 6-1 decision on Monday, ruled the judge acted properly and had a right to use broad discretion in deciding what evidence is not relevant or would not be significantly helpful to the jury.

LOAD COMMENTS ()

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide