- Associated Press - Friday, May 1, 2015

DENVER (AP) - A Colorado Senate panel rejected a bill Friday calling for expanded use of body cameras by police officers despite its bipartisan support and backing of law enforcement.

“I was stunned,” said Republican Sen. John Cooke, a former sheriff who was sponsoring the bill.

The proposal was one of about a dozen that lawmakers have considered this year in response to allegations of police misconduct around the nation. Many of the measures have failed, but the camera proposal was widely expected to pass.

Its rejection along with a bill that would have updated the state police training curriculum left lawmakers in danger of having little to show for what was an ambitious plan to curb law enforcement power and increase oversight.

The camera measure previously cleared the state House and would have encouraged departments to acquire the technology by creating a grant program.

Sen. Kent Lambert, a Republican on the Senate Appropriations Committee, which rejected the camera and training bills, said there was concern that a lot of police departments already have money for the cameras.

“So I’m not so sure that that needs to be a grant program from the state,” he said.

Cooke was also carrying the training bill, which sought to add civilians to the state training board for peace officers to give the public more influence over how agencies operate. It would have also required classes for law enforcement officers on subjects such as improving community relations with police and de-escalation tactics.

Cooke said he’s considering having both bills reconsidered before the legislative session ends Wednesday.

Law enforcement agencies supported the grant program for the cameras, saying it would help smaller, rural departments afford the devices.

Regarding the training bill, Lambert said there was a lack of information about its purpose. The measure needed $350,000 to add a couple of staffers to the Department of Law.

“Part of the question was, what is the training for?” Lambert said.

Lawmakers have also rejected legislation that would have forbid officers from using chokeholds unless it was for self-defense. Another failed measure would have made it easier for citizens to petition to have special prosecutors appointed to investigate cases of excessive or deadly force when no charges were filed.

Other proposals addressing law enforcement oversight that are still pending include collecting demographic data on officer-involved shootings and protecting citizens’ right to record police activity in public.

___

Find Ivan Moreno on Twitter: https://twitter.com/IvanJourno

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More

Click to Hide