- - Sunday, November 8, 2015


Public agitation and rhetoric surrounding police relations with the black community have reached a fever pitch. Many have already chosen sides, either blindly siding with law enforcement or, conversely, viewing every publicized encounter between police and black citizens as a referendum on race.

The incendiary language among many protesters has recently produced calls for violence against officers. This has justifiably stoked fears among police officers that they will be randomly targeted and added considerably to the stress of a profession already fraught with danger and uncertainty.

When a man who happened to be black allegedly ambushed and killed Harris County, Texas, sheriff’s Deputy Darren Goforth last week, some police officers pointed their fingers at the “Black Lives Matter” movement, saying it had created a climate in which police officers as a class will be singled out for violence. The motive for the killing is unknown at this time, but law enforcement officers have gone on record to link Deputy Goforth’s death to rising anti-cop attitudes among the general public.

But cops are people, too. Just like you and me, they attend the same churches, send their children to the same schools, go to ballgames and participate in civic activities just like their fellow citizens. The major difference is that every day the police put on a uniform and a badge that certifies that they have sworn to uphold the law and protect the rest of us.

That duty to uphold the law sometimes puts officers in confrontations in which they have to resort to deadly force. It does not give officers an unfettered right to kill citizens — even if they are believed to be breaking the law. On the other hand, it does not mean that officers should be expected to expose themselves to deadly violence. The duty to “protect and serve” as officers also applies to their own lives. They are members of our community and as citizens enjoy the same constitutional rights as everyone else. That is why some in law enforcement believe that a threat against police officers as a class is also a threat against the society that they are sworn to protect.

For the past 20 years, crime of all types has dropped considerably all around the United States. Homicide rates stand at a 30-year low, largely because of the job law enforcement officers do every day. When violence does occur, most Americans feel confident in knowing that a professional, effective and well-equipped law enforcement officer is just a phone call away. This is especially true in communities plagued by drugs and violent crime; in fact, residents of these communities often clamor the loudest for heightened police presence.

In the wake of anti-police backlashes in New York and Baltimore, crime has spiked considerably in those cities. Homicide rates, robbery and theft have risen in the wake of what many believe may be officers’ hesitance to engage suspects for fear of being caught up in some public controversy over how they do their jobs. Worse yet, officers may have started to question themselves and become more fearful for their own safety in the wake of such uncertainty. Increased scrutiny on police officers has also created an incredible amount of red tape, with the use of body cameras and mandatory documentation of even casual encounters with citizens.

Matters that were once resolved informally are now matters of public record and have to be done by the book. In the wake of a court decree in the stop-and-frisk cases in New York City, police must now provide every citizen they stop and question (but don’t arrest) with a receipt. Many police officers believe that this will open them up to all sorts of warrantless complaints, litigation and punitive administrative processes that at the end of the day interfere with their primary responsibility to serve and protect.

Whatever the ultimate causes for the growing state of distrust between law enforcement and the public, the fact is that it now undeniably exists. And it is a problem that has to be addressed.

The question of how to restore trust and respect for authority in our society is not limited to the police. It is a question that almost all traditional authority figures are facing — including parents and teachers. We all want to live in a safe society. And at the same time we expect our constitutional rights to be upheld.

The only way both aims can possibly be achieved is for us to take a step back, reduce the incendiary rhetoric to a simmer, and begin to restore a level of civility to our discourse. And because we rely on mutual respect to preserve our free society, we should all universally and unequivocally condemn the cowardly act of ambushing a uniformed officer and gunning him down in cold blood.

Armstrong Williams is sole owner/manager of Howard Stirk Holdings and executive editor of American CurrentSee online magazine.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide