- Associated Press - Wednesday, September 30, 2015

TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that doctors don’t have to tell patients whether they have malpractice insurance for surgeries they’re recommending.

The Record (https://bit.ly/1QLtmut ) reports the unanimous ruling made Tuesday stemmed from a lawsuit against Richard Kaul. Officials say the anesthesiologist performed back surgeries for years in same-day operating centers even though he lacked training to operate on spines.

James Jarrell and his wife won a $750,000 judgment against Kaul after he experienced sharp pain following surgery. But they sought more compensation on appeal, arguing that Kaul should pay because he lacked malpractice insurance and failed to tell them.

The court disagreed.

Kaul lost his medical license years ago after a state investigation into complaints for patients who had severe pain after surgery.


Information from: The Record (Woodland Park, N.J.), https://www.northjersey.com

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide