- Associated Press - Thursday, June 23, 2016

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Is it bank robbery if someone gives a note to a teller demanding money, but doesn’t explicitly threaten to use force?

Washington’s Supreme Court says yes. In a decision Thursday, the justices unanimously held that such a note implies a threat of violence, and thus it’s robbery rather than theft, which is the stealing of property without such a threat.

The ruling came in the case of Charles Verdel Farnsworth, who was convicted in Pierce County Superior Court for his role in a 2009 bank robbery. Farnsworth’s partner presented a note to a teller which read in part, “no tracking devices, put the money in the bag.”

The justices divided closely on another issue in the case, saying 5-4 that his co-defendant’s plea agreement should have been introduced at his trial. But the court declined to toss his conviction on that ground.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide