- Associated Press - Monday, November 28, 2016

Here is a sampling of editorial opinions from Alaska newspapers:

Nov. 25, 2016

Juneau Empire: Changing Denali name likely Trump pillow talk

Two wrongs don’t make a right. We hope President-elect Donald Trump remembers that during any future conversations (or tweets) in regards to changing the name of Denali back to Mount McKinley.

The name change was one of many vows Trump the candidate made during his rise to the White House. He called the name change, announced by President Barack Obama on the eve of his Alaska visit in 2015, a “great insult to Ohio.” He later declared in a tweet that if elected he’d change the name back.

The name Mount McKinley was already a great insult to Alaska Natives, particularly Athabascans, who hunted, fished and lived in the mountain’s shadow for thousands of years before white men staked their claim. As if that alone weren’t enough to warrant using its original name, we’ll again remind everyone that Ohio-born William McKinley, our 25th president, never stepped foot in Alaska, and the mountain was given the name by a prospector who neither “discovered” it nor had had the right to name it.

Our nation’s highest peak (20,310 feet) already had a name, given to it by Alaska’s first people, when William A. Dickey renamed it.

Trump the candidate has made lots of promises which Trump the president-elect has already backed away from. We wouldn’t be surprised if his desire to rename Denali was merely pillow talk to win Ohio’s electoral votes earlier this month. If Trump is serious, however, this is one battle he won’t win easily.

It took a century for Alaskans to win back the name of their most famous mountain, and any effort to undo that change would be hard fought. For Trump, such a move would also be seen as one more slight to a minority group. So far it’s mostly been Trump’s words that have offended minorities; changing Denali’s name would show his actions as president follow suit.

It’s unlikely Congress would rush to Trump’s aid in making this happen, so Trump would need an executive order, the very thing he’s often criticized Obama for using. Again, it’s a no-win scenario for Trump.

It’s more likely this issue will cool off soon enough, until Trump needs the support of Ohio again. For the next few years we don’t expect to hear much about changing the name of Denali back to Mount McKinley - until around 2020 when the race for the White House heats up once more.


Nov. 23, 2016

Fairbanks Daily News-Miner: Denali name should remain

President-elect Donald Trump made many promises on the campaign trail, but one in particular raised eyebrows in the Last Frontier - a vow to change the name of North America’s highest peak back to Mt. McKinley. The mountain’s name, changed to Denali by President Barack Obama just before a trip to Alaska in 2015, had long been a source of debate inside the state and Outside. And though there are legitimate complaints to be made about the manner in which the change was made, reverting the name would be a greater mistake and one out of step with the way the mountain has come to be known.

The Mt. McKinley moniker came about in 1896, the result of an Ohio prospector who wanted to buoy the presidential candidate from his home state. The name was adopted by federal authorities in 1917, and stood for 98 years before President Obama’s executive action to return it to its traditional Athabascan name of Denali. But the name never sat well with many Alaskans. The state board on geographic names established Denali as the Alaska’s name for the mountain. For years, the state’s U.S. senators had tried to make the same change on the federal level, but members of Congress from Ohio were able to gum up the works by introducing legislation relating to its name such that the U.S. Geological Survey couldn’t enact a name change on its own. They also blocked any efforts to vote on bills that would change the name to Denali, which were regularly authored by Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

President Obama ultimately resorted to executive action to change the mountain’s name, one of the few occasions on which Alaska’s delegation in Washington, D.C., cheered such a move. The action sat less well with some others, however, who felt executive action of that sort is wrong regardless of whether you agree with the result. That opinion is principled, and it’s not wrong. But in the case of the restoration of Denali’s name, the executive action came in response to an intentional blockade by a few people - often just a single Ohio lawmaker in Congress who took up the issue to drum up goodwill at home by supporting a native son of the state. The fight had already stretched for decades, and there was no way save executive action that it would have ended.

Other objections have been raised with the reversion of place names to former names, usually of Native origin, that few people alive today use. Those who raise this argument ask whether all of the place names in Alaska or other locales will eventually be reverted to names that are unfamiliar to most of the state’s people. This is not an unreasonable question to ask. But if a place has a traditional name well known to the people, especially as is the case with Denali, the “renaming” of the place to its Native name isn’t an act of revisionism but rather of restoration, respecting a name more meaningful to the state’s people than one applied with little thought by itinerant prospectors or other new arrivals in the early years of the Gold Rush.

This isn’t to say, of course, that all or even most of the state’s places should be renamed. Fairbanks, for instance, is another place named to curry favor with an Outside politician, but it was not a place of particular significance to Alaska’s Native people before E.T. Barnette was thrown off a steamer in 1901. But in cases where the traditional name for a place never passed from use, and has been in widespread use among all the state’s people for many years, there’s a strong argument that the name should be restored. Such is the case with Denali.

President-elect Trump may choose to make good on his campaign promise to switch Denali’s name back to Mt. McKinley, but such an action would be a mistake, and would require him to exercise the same method that some found objectionable when used by President Obama. Moreover, it would disrespect a mountain that, as Sen. Murkowski said, Alaskans have for generations known as “the Great One.”

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide