ROME — Anthropologists said they have pieced together Leonardo da Vinci’s left index fingerprint — a discovery that could help provide information on such matters as the food the artist ate and whether his mother was of Arabic origin.
The reconstruction of the fingerprint was the result of three years of research and could help attribute disputed paintings or manuscripts, said Luigi Capasso, an anthropologist and director of the Anthropology Research Institute at Chieti University in central Italy.
“It adds the first touch of humanity. We knew how Leonardo saw the world and the future … but who was he? This biological information is about his being human, not being a genius,” Mr. Capasso said in a recent telephone interview.
The research was based on a first core of photographs of about 200 fingerprints — most of them partial — taken from about 52 papers handled by Leonardo.
Mr. Capasso’s work, presented in 2005 in a specialized magazine called Anthropologie, published in the Czech Republic, is on display in an exhibition in the town of Chieti through March 30.
The artist often ate while working, and Mr. Capasso and other specialists said his fingerprints could include traces of saliva, blood or the food he ate. It is information that could help clear up questions about his origins.
Certain distinctive features are more common in the fingerprints of some ethnic populations, specialists say.
“The one we found in this finger tip applies to 60 percent of the Arabic population, which suggests the possibility that his mother was of Middle Eastern origin,” Mr. Capasso said.
Other specialists, however, say that determining ethnicity based on fingerprints is vague.
What the science says, “generally speaking, is that if your parent has a lot of arches, you’ll probably have a lot of arches,” said Simon Cole, associate professor of criminology, law and society at the University of California at Irvine.
“The science essentially comes up with breakdowns: x percent of Asians have arches, x have whorls, x have loops. Some races have very low incidences of some patterns and very high incidences of others.”
But “you can’t predict one person’s race from these kinds of incidences,” he said, especially if you’re looking at only one finger.
The idea that Leonardo’s mother could have been a slave who came to Tuscany from Constantinople — now Istanbul — is not new and has been the object of other research.
Alessandro Vezzosi, a Leonardo specialist and the director of a museum dedicated to the artist in his hometown of Vinci, said there are documents that appear to back this up.
“This coincides with documented indications that she was Oriental, at least from the Mediterranean area, not a peasant of Vinci,” he said.
Mr. Vezzosi, who manages the archive of documents Mr. Capasso used for his study, warned that her origin cannot be determined with any certainty until a contract documenting her sale is found.
“Still, her name was Caterina, the most common name among slaves in Tuscany,” he said.
The specialists say some of the fingerprints left on the manuscripts might belong to the people who handled them over time. However, those caused by attempts to remove ink blots were surely left by the author, Mr. Capasso said.
Biological information on Leonardo is largely incomplete. The artist, who was generally but not exclusively left-handed, used his fingers to paint, and his thumb print recurs on the manuscripts, Mr. Vezzosi said.
Leonardo sometimes worked while eating or traveling, and his fingers were often dirty, sometimes with residue of food, Mr. Vezzosi said.
Carlo Vecce, a professor of Italian literature at the University of Naples and a leading Leonardo specialist, said the research, in which he was not involved, appears to be “founded.”
“The research on Leonardo’s fingerprints is very interesting. It’s always good to locate and distinguish these details both on the paintings and on the drawings,” he said. “The fingerprints can tell us if Leonardo was there or if he intervened [on a painting], it’s a hint.” Mr. Vecce noted, though, that a fingerprint is not enough proof to attribute a work with certainty, and such a discovery does not necessarily add much to what is known about the artist.
“It gives us the illusion of a contact with the genius,” he said. “But the most important things about Leonardo are those that concern his intellectual activity, those that we get by reading his words or interpreting what he wrote.”
Please read our comment policy before commenting.