Rep. Tom Lantos of California, a member of the delegation House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is leading to Syria, put the mission clearly: “We have an alternative Democratic foreign policy.” Democrats can have any foreign policy they want — if and when they are elected to the White House.
Until Nancy Pelosi came along, it was understood by all that we had only one president at a time and — like him or not — he alone had the constitutional authority to speak for this country to foreign nations, especially in wartime.
All Mrs. Pelosi’s trip can accomplish is to advertise American disunity to a terrorist-sponsoring nation in the Middle East while we are in a war there. That in turn can only embolden the Syrians to exploit the lack of unified resolve in Washington by stepping up their efforts to destabilize Iraq and the Middle East in general.
Members of the opposition party, whichever party that might be at a given time, knew their role was not to intervene abroad themselves to undermine this country’s foreign policy, however much they might criticize it at home.
During the World War II, the defeated Republican presidential candidate, Wendell Willkie, even acted as President Roosevelt’s personal envoy to British Prime Minister Winston Churchill.
He understood we were all in this together, however we might disagree among ourselves about the best course to follow.
Today, Nancy Pelosi and the congressional Democrats are stepping in to carry out their own foreign policy and even their own military policy on troop deployment — all the while denying they are intruding on the president’s authority.
They are doing the same thing domestically by making a big media circus over the fact the Bush administration fired eight U.S. attorneys. These attorneys are among many officials who serve at the pleasure of the president — which means they can be fired at any time for any reason or for no reason.
That is why there was no big hullabaloo in the media when Bill Clinton fired all the U.S. attorneys across the country — even though that got rid of the U.S. attorneys conducting an ongoing investigation into corruption in his own administration as governor of Arkansas. So much hate has been hyped against George W. Bush that anything done against him is unlikely to be questioned in most of the media.
But whatever passing damage is being done to Mr. Bush is a relatively minor compared to the lasting damage being done to the presidency as an institution that will still be here when George W. Bush is gone. Once it becomes accepted it is all right to violate both the laws and the traditions of this nation, and to undermine the ability of the United States to speak to other nations of the world with one voice, we will have taken another fateful step downward into the degeneration of this society.
Such a drastic and irresponsible step should remove any lingering doubt that the Democrats’ political strategy is to ensure there is an American defeat in Iraq, in order to ensure their own political victory in 2008. That these political games are played while Iran advances relentlessly toward acquiring nuclear weapons is a fateful sign of the utter unreality of politicians preoccupied with scoring points and a media obsessed with celebrity bimbos, living and dead.
Once Iran has nuclear weapons, that irreversible change will mark a defining moment in the history of the United States and of Western civilization, which will forever after live at the mercy of hate-filled suicidal fanatics and sadists.
Yet among too many politicians in Washington, it is business as usual. Indeed, it is monkey business as usual, as congressional Democrats revel in the power of their new and narrow election victory last year to drag people before committee hearings and posture for the television cameras.
It has been said the world ends not with a bang but with a whimper. But who would have thought it could end with political clowning in the shadow of a mushroom cloud?
Thomas Sowell is a nationally syndicated columnist.