- The Washington Times - Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Although the federal government invests heavily in research, it’s China that gets more out of it, according to a Defense Department study of its spending that is getting attention on Capitol Hill.

Sen. Joni Ernst, Iowa Republican, touted the findings of the study Wednesday. She said the Pentagon’s conclusions should be worrying not just to the defense world but also to every government agency that spends on research that might be of interest to China.

China, not the U.S., is the ultimate beneficiary of DoD and other [U.S. government] research investments,” the Pentagon’s review concluded, according to Ms. Ernst.

The Pentagon’s review is not public and Ms. Ernst’s office said it could not share the document, but she described the trickery at work. She said it goes beyond the traditional boundaries of intellectual property theft.

China finds companies that are receiving federal research funding and recruits those firms to work for institutions associated with its military operations. The American company then dissolves, and whatever has been developed with the U.S. funds is transferred to a subsidiary in China, Ms. Ernst said.

She blasted the “double-crossing companies” that take the cash and then take their work to China.

SEE ALSO: Harris condemns China’s ‘provocations,’ pledges U.S. support for Taiwan

In one instance, she said, a research team was working on four grants to develop drone and spacecraft technology. It was recruited by the Chinese government and now works “for institutions affiliated with the communist regime’s defense agency.”

Those kinds of transfers have also taken place on research into biohazard detectors, solar energy technology and pharmaceuticals, as well as designs for “military devices,” she said.

“Folks, no matter how much of your money Washington spends to ‘win’ the global tech race, we will never win by surrendering American-made innovation and subsidizing our adversaries,” Ms. Ernst said. “This cycle will continue until these grant programs are both required and empowered to hold unscrupulous recipients of taxpayer funds accountable for selling out to China.”

The Defense Department report looked at spending by the Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer programs, which require specific government agencies to set aside money from their research and development funds to promote high-risk work by small businesses.

The Center for Strategic and International Studies said in a report this month that the programs are worth about $3.2 billion and that the Defense Department accounts for $1.7 billion of the total.

According to CSIS, the secret Pentagon audit looked over a sample of the Defense Department’s awards and found “nearly all cases” showed China benefiting more than the U.S.

“The study’s authors cautioned that the study sample was small and that their methodologies warrant review, but their findings are clearly a matter of concern for U.S. policymakers,” the think tank said.

In response to an inquiry from The Washington Times, the Pentagon did not provide the non-public report but said none of the technology involved is classified. Once a project becomes classified, the Small Business Innovation Research program can no longer fund it.

The Pentagon said the spending helps small firms bridge what is known in the industry as the “Valley of Death” — the difficulty in taking a project from proof of concept to production.

“Difficulty accessing capital can lead to the risk posed by adversaries. In other words, if DoD won’t fund them, another country likely will,” the Defense Department said.

The Pentagon said it has imposed controls on the spending, including requirements on disclosures of who gets the money. Training is also available to combat cybersecurity threats.

Ms. Ernst is eyeing more steps. She has co-written legislation that would renew the small-business programs through 2025 but include a ban on doling out money to a firm with ties to China or any other “foreign country of concern” and poses a conflict of interest or a national security risk.

The bill also requires the National Science Foundation and the Departments of Defense, Energy and Health and Human Services to report back on how much foreign militaries have tried to hijack the programs.

That bill, sponsored by Sen. Benjamin L. Cardin, Maryland Democrat, and Ms. Ernst, cleared the Senate last week and is expected to see House action this week.

• Stephen Dinan can be reached at sdinan@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide