advertisement
Email | Print | Subscribe

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Click-2-Listen Listen to this article or download audio file.
advertisement

Watch for merit pay to go to the mongrels

By Mike Causey
February 19, 2008

When the Bush administration and a Republican-led Congress set up the new federal merit pay system about five years ago, it was the leading contender for government reform efforts Best in Show award.


Now, it appears that if the pay-for-performance model survives the next president, Republican or Democrat, it will be more like a stunted mutt than a streamlined greyhound — not that there's anything wrong with mutts.


Under the original timetable, pay-for-performance should cover about half of the white-collar federal work force by now. Instead, thanks to opposition from unions and mostly Democratic members of Congress, the projected great leap forward has turned into a limp.


At the Defense Department, the biggest proving ground, the reward-punishment pay system covers only workers who are not part of various unions' bargaining units. Although most feds do not belong to or pay dues to unions, most of them are covered by union agreements that have shielded them from merit pay plans at Defense, Homeland Security and other agencies.


In various court fights, unions were told that they couldn't challenge portions of the merit pay system — called the National Security Personnel System at Defense — such as rating systems or the criteria to be used to see who did and who did not get raises. But they were allowed to zero in on labor-management issues. Unions, almost from Day One, have said the various pay-for-performance plans were a way to end-run unions or break them outright.


Officials at the Defense Department and other agencies — charged with carrying out the program mandated by the White House and Congress — said they had no desire or intent to break unions, but rather to work with them on bigger issues.


"In some places every time we even wanted to propose a change, we had to meet with dozens of unions ... each of them bringing along a dozen people ... over some very small proposed changes," one official said. He said the joke became that "the reasons the fights were so bloody was that the stakes were so small."


How small? A labor-management type at the Treasury Department said the union once filed a grievance against an Internal Revenue Service official "because he didn't say 'hello' to a union rep he passed on the steps."


Click-2-Listen Listen to this article or download audio file.
Front Page > Nation/Politics > Federal Report
advertisement
advertisement
Copyright © 1999 - 2007 News World Communications, Inc. http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20070122-123852-9378r.htm
The Washington Times Advertising Links
 
advertisement
advertisement
The Washington Times - AP Video

advertisement
The Washington Times Breaking News The Washington Times Classifieds The Washington Times Market Place

The Washington             Times - Brighter. Bolder. Privacy Policy | About TWT | Community Relations | Site Map | Contact Us
Advertise | Subscription Services | Arbor Ballroom |
twt xml
All site contents copyright © 2008 The Washington Times, LLC.