Thursday, May 8, 2008

DURHAM, N.C.

The signs were impossible to miss while driving onto Duke’s campus late last month, reminders driven into the sod in front yards and at street corners of looming change.

“I was pulling up to a light, and I saw the same thing — ’Freda Black for district attorney,’ ” midfielder Michael Ward said. “I’m thinking, ’Why couldn’t we get this lady in back then?’ ”



Then was two years ago, when three of Ward’s Duke lacrosse teammates faced rape accusations and the Blue Devils’ season was canceled after only eight games.

So many of the major names from that spring either have left their jobs — district attorney Mike Nifong, police investigators Mark Gottlieb and Benjamin Himan, Duke athletic director Joe Alleva — or will retire by the end of June (John Burness, Duke’s senior vice president for public affairs).

The three players wrongfully charged with rape are gone, too: David Evans graduated. Reade Seligmann transferred to Brown and Collin Finnerty to Loyola.

But many players remain, some longer than anyone would expect. The NCAA granted the remaining players from the 2006 team an extra year of eligibility last spring.

Ward is one of five fifth-year seniors on Duke’s roster this year, a group writing another chapter to their careers while irritating many in the lacrosse world who view the Blue Devils as an all-star team.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Sure enough, Duke (16-1) is the top seed in the NCAA tournament, which begins this weekend.

“This program won’t be normal for a couple years, I don’t think, and this fifth-year thing probably delayed that process even more,” senior Matt Danowski said. “What happened two years ago is going to stay with this program.”

•••

The Blue Devils’ heralded senior class — including Danowski, the Tewaaraton Trophy winner — lost 12-11 to Johns Hopkins in the NCAA final May 28.

It wasn’t a time for goodbyes since the group quickly left for a postgraduation trip to Cabo San Lucas, Mexico. But their college lacrosse careers seemed over — until the NCAA issued its ruling two days later.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Some guys were emotionally spent after a draining 14 months in Durham since the case first made headlines. Others had jobs to step into. Midfielder Peter Lamade transferred to Virginia to play out his extra season.

Others — Danowski, Ward, goalie Dan Loftus, defenseman Tony McDevitt and long pole Nick O’Hara — soon discussed the opportunity awaiting them.

“We were just like, ’Let’s do this,’ ” Loftus said. “We all applied [to graduate school]. We all got in. From that point on we said to ourselves, let’s not put pressure on ourselves.”

There were nagging issues to take care of, particularly with finances. The business school-bound McDevitt reupped his apartment lease and soon snagged one next door to complete something of a super-senior housing complex. Ward delayed his entrance to law school.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Coach John Danowski faced blending two groups of seniors together. One talent-laden group already experienced a last run, only to be handed another. There also was the possible need to smooth egos of players who waited their turn for a larger on-field presence, only to be relegated to a reduced role.

“I guess there’s a natural progress as far as leadership goes on a team,” McDevitt said. “We wanted to be very sensitive of the seniors. We wanted to allow them to have leadership roles on and off the field, especially off the field because that’s where a lot of bonding goes on.”

Of course, winning solves most problems. The Blue Devils collected the ACC title for the second straight year, and they are the tournament’s No. 1 seed again as well.

That has been enough to keep everyone in the program happy — especially the veterans who concede their return is connected as much to chasing a title as furthering their education.

Advertisement
Advertisement

“It’s 1A and 1B, and I’d have to actually put that national championship opportunity as 1A,” O’Hara said. “I’m not going to kid anybody on that. The goal of anybody in athletics growing up is to be a champion.”

•••

As with everything else related to Duke lacrosse in the last two-plus years, the story is not entirely warm and fuzzy.

The Blue Devils, buttressed by the return of two first-team All-Americans and two more third-team All-Americans, are the cause of grumbling among coaches and fans who believe there is a tilted field favoring Duke this season.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The way they have played — with an average victory margin of 8.4 goals and a propensity for extended flourishes like the one that turned a 5-3 lead over North Carolina in last month’s ACC semifinals into a 17-6 rout — only encourages such resentment.

“What’s the best way to say this?” North Carolina coach John Haus said afterward when asked of Duke’s ability to break open games. “They have a wealth of experience.”

Haus is hardly the only one with such sentiments, and from a competitive standpoint it’s hard to blame anyone unfortunate enough to encounter the Duke buzz saw.

But the Blue Devils aren’t apologetic, either, especially since two more classes still have the opportunity to use an extra year. John Danowski said midfielder Brad Ross plans to return next season.

“People want to bash it and say the fifth year it’s unfair, but there’s fifth-year guys everywhere on every single program,” O’Hara said. “I can understand the hostility about the amount of talent that came back. That’s what it’s about.”

Added John Danowski: “Does it give us a competitive advantage this year? Yes, it does. Yes. Did Duke have a competitive disadvantage two years ago? Absolutely, they had no team. Does it even out? I don’t know. In the big scheme of things, kids have the opportunity to go to school and continue to play, and I don’t consider that a bad thing.”

Neither is moving on, which will happen later this month.

This time the end will not be tinged with anger or bitterness or outright exhaustion. It might even end well. But even if Duke doesn’t win a title, the Blue Devils staked with a second chance are simply grateful for the opportunity.

“Last year, whether we denied it or not or spoke about it or not, guys put added pressure on themselves to prove [CNN’s] Nancy Grace wrong on the field,” Matt Danowski said. “Guys wanted to do that by beating every team by 10 goals. This year, it’s not about that anymore. It’s about going out and having fun and enjoying what we have.”

Just like they used to.

Copyright © 2026 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.