Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Hillary slams top court’s decisions

ASSOCIATED PRESS

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday said Supreme Court victories this year for homosexual couples, minorities and women do not erase the distrust created by other “legally dubious” rulings, including the Bush v. Gore presidential election case.

“These favorable decisions in recent months should not obscure the torrent of aggressively activist and legally dubious decisions of times past,” Mrs. Clinton, New York Democrat, told the American Constitution Society.

She said this is “the same court that gave us Bush v. Gore, which made a mockery of one of our most cherished constitutional rights, the right to vote,” a reference to the 2000 ruling that ended Democrat Al Gore’s chances of winning the White House.

Mrs. Clinton also mentioned past court rulings on guns, worker rights and age discrimination.

This summer, the court ruled that colleges may continue to use race as a factor in picking students, that homosexual men and women cannot be prosecuted for having sex and that state government workers are protected under a federal law intended to ease work and family conflicts.

The rulings angered conservatives and were opposed by some of the court’s most conservative members.

Mrs. Clinton made the comments at the first convention of the American Constitution Society, a liberal lawyers’ group that intends to challenge the older and more influential Federalist Society, a conservative law association. Mrs. Clinton had also complained about the Supreme Court in a speech last year to society members.

“In addition to installing an American president, the current Supreme Court has invalidated federal laws at the most astounding rate in our nation’s history,” she said then.

Yesterday, Mrs. Clinton defended Senate Democrats’ filibuster of three of President Bush’s federal appeals court nominees they consider too conservative: Texas Judge Priscilla Owen, District of Columbia lawyer Miguel Estrada and Alabama Attorney General William Pryor.

Mrs. Clinton said the White House was playing politics with the choices.

President Bush yesterday denounced the Democratic filibusters. “These obstructionist tactics are unprecedented, unfair and unfaithful to the Senate’s constitutional responsibility to vote on judicial nominees,” Mr. Bush said in a statement.

Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, Tennessee Republican, said Republicans would keep fighting for Mr. Bush’s blocked nominees when the Senate returns from its break in September.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.