The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story

Agricultural subsidies targeted

By

Originally published 11:40 p.m., December 7, 2003, updated 12:00 a.m., December 8, 2003

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

U.S. and European agricultural subsidies, worth billions of dollars to farmers, will be open to attack at the World Trade Organization as soon as next month.

Trade analysts do not foresee an onslaught of disputes but do expect some countries to challenge subsidies on specific commodities or to throw up barriers against subsidized products. The threat of a WTO case also offers leverage in ongoing trade negotiations.

"I think U.S. and European subsidy policies are subject to legal challenge at the WTO. There are billions or tens of billions of dollars in consequences," said Richard Steinberg, a law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles.

Mr. Steinberg co-authored a paper on the so-called peace clause that expires Dec. 31. He is considered a leading authority on its legal implications.

The clause protects countries that use agriculture subsidies from WTO dispute resolution, the global trade equivalent of a lawsuit. Subsidies generally are illegal, but the 1992 clause grants an exemption for farm payments.

Most rich countries offer some support to farmers, with the European Union, Japan and the United States leading the way. South Korea, Norway, Switzerland and Iceland also offer significant payments to producers.

"We are entering into some uncharted territory. What we would hope to see ... is that people focus on working to move WTO negotiations forward so that we can achieve some comprehensive global trade reform," said Richard Mills, spokesman for the U.S. Trade Representative's Office.

WTO delegates are scheduled to meet in Geneva Dec. 15 to try to revive global trade talks, but expectations for the meeting are low. Negotiations collapsed in September partly because of a fight over agriculture subsidies.

"We definitely have our problems. ... We're already beginning to see some challenges occurring," said Chris Garza, a trade specialist at the American Farm Bureau Federation, an industry group.

Continue reading 12Next

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments
Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  3. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  4. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  5. Israeli know-how
  6. EDITORIAL: Sotomayor plays the race card
  7. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  8. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. Recession tea leaves 'misread'

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

Karzai asks NATO to explain civilian deaths

Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status

Tremors jar G-8

Inside the Ring

Taliban eyes new allies

Israeli know-how

EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear

Polluting nations not on board with G-8

Golf Report

Iraqis stay silent on protests in Iran

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.