Iraq war foes who support mission in Liberia say U.N. request is key

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Many congressional Democrats who have opposed the war in Iraq support sending troops to Liberia, especially because it would be at the request of the United Nations.

Sen. Carl Levin, Michigan Democrat, has been among the most strident foes of President Bush's Iraq policy. He voted against the use of force, accused the president of "going it alone" and lamented that the war had isolated the United States from its European allies.

However, Mr. Levin has warmed to the idea of sending troops to Liberia.

"If this is a U.N.-authorized mission, then we surely should consider participating in it," Mr. Levin said. "But it would be wise ... for there to be a vote in Congress before that is done."

All but three members of the Congressional Black Caucus have opposed the war in Iraq, yet the group is urging the Bush administration to send troops to Liberia as soon as possible.

"We are not recommending sending our troops to fight a war," Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, Maryland Democrat and chairman of the Black Caucus, said at a Capitol Hill news conference last week. "Our troops will be part of a force that will be serving in a peacekeeping and stabilizing capacity."

In March, Mr. Cummings and the Black Caucus opposed the war in Iraq, saying there was no "clearly demonstrated and imminent threat of attack on the United States."

Jack Spencer, senior policy analyst for defense and national security at the Heritage Foundation, said the Black Caucus was being hypocritical.

"Anyone who argued against going to Iraq and for going into Liberia is morally bankrupt," Mr. Spencer said. "The Iraqis were in the same miserable conditions that the Liberians are in now. For the Congressional Black Caucus to begin arguing for the best way to help these Liberians is to throw a bunch of peacekeepers in there is foolish."