Court rejects anti-U.S. petitions

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

From combined dispatches

THE HAGUE -- The new International Criminal Court yesterday rejected more than 100 requests to investigate complaints about the U.S.-led war in Iraq, saying it had no jurisdiction to act on these claims.

"We have received communications about acts allegedly perpetrated by U.S. troops in Iraq but we are not mandated to prosecute such acts since neither Iraq nor the United States is a state party to the court," ICC Chief Prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo said.

Neither country has signed the 1998 Rome Statute, the treaty that created the court.

The ICC, which formally came into being in July of last year, is mandated to try genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. The court can only hear cases concerning events that occurred after July 1, 2002.

Of the 499 complaints or requests filed with the court from 66 countries, more than 100 dealt with the war in Iraq where U.S. and British troops led a coalition of forces that toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein in April. Sixteen complaints involved the actions of U.S. troops in Iraq.

Mr. Moreno-Ocampo said he may investigate charges of crimes against humanity for the massacre of thousands of civilians in Congo.

Congo would be the first case examined in depth by the veteran Argentine prosecutor, and was the only one that qualified for the court's jurisdiction, he said.

Mr. Moreno-Ocampo said up to 5,000 civilians have been killed in tribal wars in Congo's Ituri province since the court started functioning. Militias backed since 1998 by the governments of Uganda, Rwanda and by Congo itself engaged in widespread torture, rape and occasional acts of cannibalism, according to reports reaching the court.