- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Head Start reform
Question of the Day
The same folks that led the unsuccessful opposition to welfare reform in 1996 are now targeting Republican efforts to reform Head Start, the federal government’s $6.8 billion preschool program for the poor. When President Clinton finally signed the Republican-controlled Congress’ historic welfare-reform legislation, Children’s Defense Fund (CDF) President Marian Wright Edelman harshly denounced Mr. Clinton.
Now that President Bush and another Republican-controlled Congress are seeking to administer some badly needed reform to the Head Start program, Mrs. Edelman is once again making wild charges. “The Bush administration’s plan uses state flexibility as a guise to weaken crucial protections for poor children,” Mrs. Edelman said. It’s worth noting that state flexibility provided the foundation for the immensely successful welfare-reform legislation. Having been so wrong on welfare reform, CDF has reduced credibility when mounting new attacks.
The goals of Head Start, which was created in 1965 as part of President Johnson’s Great Society, were laudable. Research, however, has demonstrated that whatever cognitive benefits children derive from it tend to fade quickly. The Bush administration has rightly concluded that “low-income children continue to perform significantly below their more advantaged peers in reading and mathematics once they enter school.”
During his 2000 presidential campaign, Mr. Bush repeatedly identified “the soft bigotry of low expectations” as today’s biggest source of racial discrimination. “Reading is the new civil right,” he emphasized. Reforming Head Start to provide greater emphasis on developing long-term cognitive skills is essential if another major goal of the 2001 No Child Left Behind law — ensuring that every child can read at grade level by the third grade — is to be achieved.
Last week, the House Education and Workforce subcommittee on education reform approved a bill that would increase Head Start’s focus on literacy and academics and improve teacher quality in the program, which serves more than 900,000 disadvantaged children at a cost of about $7,000 per child. The bill includes a provision that would grant unprecedented flexibility to as many as eight states to coordinate their own well-financed preschool programs with the federally funded Head Start program, which is now administered locally.
If the “readiness gap” is to be eliminated, Head Start must be reformed. Unhelpful in achieving these worthy goals is the self-righteousness displayed by the self-appointed — and widely discredited — “child advocates” epitomized by Mrs. Edelman and many congressional Democrats.
By Ted Cruz
Israel saves its enemies; Hamas endangers its friends
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Colorado poll shows women tuning out Democrats' 'war on women' strategy
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world