Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Sharpton breaks ranks on Brown

The Rev. Al Sharpton implored Senate Democrats yesterday not to filibuster President Bush’s nomination of California Supreme Court Justice Janice Rogers Brown to the nation’s second-highest federal court.

Justice Brown, who is black, has come under intense criticism by liberal black groups, such as the NAACP, and by Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee. The panel plans to vote this morning on her nomination to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

“I don’t agree with her politics. I don’t agree with some of her background,” said Mr. Sharpton, who is seeking the Democratic nomination for president. “But she should get an up-or-down vote.”

Democrats have been sharply critical of Justice Brown, though they have not yet explicitly vowed a filibuster, which would prevent her name from reaching the Senate floor for a confirmation vote that likely would pass. If all nine Democrats vote against the nomination today, they will likely begin a filibuster against her.

Mr. Sharpton’s comments not only complicate the vote for several Democrats on the panel, they also are a stark departure from some of the best-known black groups, such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. NAACP Chairman Julian Bond said Justice Brown is “hostile to civil rights and civil liberties and ill-prepared to sit on the nation’s second-highest court.”

“The president’s penchant for choosing extremist minority judicial candidates is an exercise in cynicism of the worst kind,” Mr. Bond said. “Clothing extreme views in color is designed to make them more difficult to oppose, but judicial selections should be based in principle, not in pigment.”

Born into a poor, sharecropping family in segregated Alabama, Justice Brown made her way through law school as a single mother. After serving in former California Gov. Pete Wilson’s administration, she was named by him to the California Supreme Court.

At a press conference yesterday, Mr. Bond and other black leaders portrayed Justice Brown as a “far right-wing extremist” and “outside the mainstream.”

They were asked how Justice Brown could be described as a right-wing ideologue when 76 percent of California voters cast ballots to return her to the bench in 1998, the highest percentage of any justice in that retention election.

“It’s inexplicable to me,” Mr. Bond said. “I cannot think of a response. But nonetheless, that election does not invalidate any of the things [we] have said.”

Mr. Sharpton echoed the concerns of many conservatives — especially black conservatives — that Justice Brown is being opposed because she doesn’t conform to the Democratic ideology that many blacks espouse.

“We’ve got to stop this monolith in black America because it impedes the freedom of expression for all of us,” Mr. Sharpton said in a television interview conducted by Sinclair Broadcasting yesterday. “I don’t think she should be opposed because she doesn’t come from some assumed club.”

Mr. Sharpton compared the filibusters to the same sort of “pocket vetoes” used for so long against blacks.

Wade Henderson, director of the Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, who attended the anti-Brown press conference, was later asked about Mr. Sharpton’s remarks.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.