The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • National

    WILLIAMS: Genuine economic stimulus

  • Politics

    Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest

  • Politics

    CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care

  • Politics

    Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote

  • Commentary

    TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress

  • Energy

    Obama backs plan to legalize illegals

  • World

    Gitmo suspects allowed laptops

Saturday, November 22, 2003

Bush's British support

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Thousands rally on anniversary of Iraq invasion
  • Iceland volcano erupts; hundreds evacuated
  • Ovechkin lights the lamp in return to play
  • Judge rejects settlement for 9/11 rescuers

By

A couple of major stories pushed President Bush's trip to London off the front pages. Until the al Qaeda attacks on British targets in Turkey and the arrest of pop singer Michael Jackson in California, the international media had been focused on English rabble-rousers protesting Mr. Bush's presence in the United Kingdom. Truth be told -- there wasn't much of a spectacle in London anyway.

Despite the initial hype, British opposition to Mr. Bush was rather unimpressive. Although estimates about the total number varied, officials from London's Metropolitan Police reported that there were at most between 70,000 and 110,000 on the streets for the major rally on Thursday. This might sound like a lot of people, but it was significantly less than the hundreds of thousands that were expected.

Thursday's numbers were also quite small when compared to previous demonstrations in the British capital. Last year, for example, more than 300,000 people marched to protest the Blair government's intention to outlaw fox hunting. Thursday's crowds were dwarfed by those who protested Reagan visits two decades ago and were devoid of the extreme violence that marked British protests against Margaret Thatcher's poll tax. The Rolling Stones squeeze more people into stadiums every day than showed up to protest Mr. Bush on one targeted date.

The fact of the matter is that international opposition to Bush policies is not as significant as it is made out to be. Numerous polls have shown that most Iraqis are worried that American troops will pull out too soon. Even a recent survey by the far-left Manchester Guardian newspaper revealed that most British support Mr. Bush. According to the poll, 62 percent of all British respond that the United States is "generally speaking a force for good, not evil, in the world." Sixty-six percent of Labour Party members support America, while only 41 percent of British oppose the war in Iraq. Those are all good numbers.

The explanation for the misconceptions about the supposed unpopularity of Mr. Bush and the war is that the press regurgitates the press releases of protesters while ignoring the evidence. Any time a global conference is held or the American president visits a foreign country, there are invariably protests -- with thousands mobilized by labor unions. These do not reflect international public opinion in general. As we were reminded this week, more British are worried about losing fox hunting than ending the U.S.-Anglo-led war in the Middle East.

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. EDITORIAL: Hiding the true cost of Obamacare
  3. RUSE: The Girl Scout Sex Guide
  4. HANSON: Proud to help -- and to fly our flag
  5. EDITORIAL: Obama surrenders gulf oil to Moscow
More Top Stories »
  1. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  2. STEYN: 'Deemocracy' in action
  3. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  4. TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress
  5. PRUDEN: Into the twilight zone

Most Commented

  1. KUHNER: Impeach the president?
  2. Obama backs plan to legalize illegals
  3. Lawmaker won't press charges in spitting incident
  4. Voight, tea party groups plan last-minute protest
  5. Key Democrat Boccieri switches to 'yes' on health vote
More Top Stories »
  1. CURL: Obama the Innocent stumps for health care
  2. Obama urges Dems to come together for health care
  3. Obama holds final pep rally for health care
  4. TURNER: Our lawbreaking Congress
  5. EDITORIAL: WWII: The most racist generation

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    Health care bill opponents: Executive order on abortion doesn't cut it

  • Belief Blog

    Nancy Pelosi invokes the 'wrong' St. Joseph

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.