- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
- U.N. rights chief: Flight MH17 downing possible war crime
- Attack on park in Gaza war kills 10, mostly children
- Calif. protesters to block Israel-owned ships at Port of Oakland
- Obama to give Africa $38M, but tells young leaders: Stop ‘making excuses’ for economy
Postal Service retracts notice to identify senders
Question of the Day
The U.S. Postal Service is withdrawing a notice in the Federal Register because its wording suggests that a plan to identify senders of bulk mail is the first step to identifying the senders of all mail.
Stephen M. Kearney, vice president of pricing and classification for the Postal Service, said the notice “has caused misunderstanding in some quarters.”
“Sender-Identified Mail: Enhanced Requirement for Discount Rate Mailings, a notice intended to clarify business customer information, will be reissued,” Mr. Kearney said in a statement.
Privacy advocates criticized the notice, which directly quoted a presidential commission report calling for the Postal Service to develop technology to identify all individual senders.
“The President’s Commission on the United States Postal Service recently recommended the use of sender-identification for every piece of mail,” according to the Federal Register, the publication in which all legislation must be listed before it takes effect. “Requiring sender-identification for discount-rate mail is an initial step on the road to intelligent mail.”
Chris Hoofnagle, associate director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, said that notice, published Oct. 21, was “very clearly written and explained the larger policy goals.”
“It appears the Postal Service wants to obscure their policy goals. It is not clear how removing the intelligent mail language relieves the threat of privacy invasion,” Mr. Hoofnagle said.
The center, which opposes mandatory sender identification requirements, plans to respond during the public comment period when the regulation is published again in the Federal Register.
“Individuals have a constitutional right to anonymity. The benefits of sender identification do not outweigh the harms to privacy,” Mr. Hoofnagle said.
The notice, first reported by The Washington Times, also cited two congressional committee recommendations urging the Postal Service to explore the concept of sender identification. This included the “feasibility of using unique, traceable identifiers applied by the creator of the mailpiece.”
A Postal Service spokesman said the notice “included some justification that in retrospect raised concerns among folks that wasn’t intended.”
“We are very concerned about privacy. It’s part of our brand, something we want to jealously protect. So mail will continue to be protected according to our highest existing privacy rules. Mailers will only be identified if they choose to sign on for a particular service that requires identification,” the spokesman said.
Asked if the Postal Service is moving toward sender identification for all mailers, the spokesman said, “Both the White House and Congress would have to determine how they want to transform the Postal Service.”
The proposals from Congress and the commission regarding sender identification stemmed from incidents two years ago in which anthrax-tainted mail was sent to U.S. senators and news organizations.
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- D.C. police chief orders officers not to arrest legal gun owners carrying weapons in public
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- DeSean Jackson working on offensive cohesiveness with Redskins teammates
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq