Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Biden wants rich to pay for Iraq

The White House yesterday delivered to Congress its proposal for $87 billion in additional war costs, and Democrats began drafting plans to bill wealthy Americans for it.

“The choices are stark but the answer to me is absolutely clear how to pay for this,” said Sen. Joseph R. Biden Jr., Delaware Democrat, ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

His plan would repeal one year of President Bush’s tax cut for the wealthiest Americans to pay for the extra war costs.

Several Democrats have signed onto the idea, and Mr. Biden said even some Republicans expressed optimism about his plan. He declined to identify them.

Publicly, Republicans were cool to the idea yesterday.

“I don’t think they ought to be playing these class-warfare games in the midst of winning this war on terrorism,” said Sen. George Allen, Virginia Republican.

Mr. Biden said he floated his idea among some of his wealthiest friends in Delaware and they all liked it.

“They know it’s right; they know it’s fair,” he said of the wealthiest 1 percent, who paid 37 percent of the nation’s personal taxes in 2000. “No one has asked anything of them.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, said: “Most of the top-rate payers are business owners. They need to be competitive because they’re the ones who employ folks. The last thing we need to do up here is stifle the economy.”

Senior administration officials said the $87 billion request has not changed significantly since Mr. Bush announced it earlier this month. The bulk of the money, more than $66 billion, would pay for military operations in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere for the next year.

Mr. Bush yesterday was unapologetic about spending $20 billion to repair Iraq’s war-torn infrastructure.

“It is vital that we succeed in Iraq,” the president said. “A free Iraq will make America more secure. A free Iraq will change the dynamics of the Middle East, which will be important for peace.”

Congress will hold hearings on the spending request next week. Republicans have said they expect to support the requests, though they also want the administration to be forthcoming about the extent of American commitment.

Democrats, though, face a difficult balancing act. They want to push for more information about war spending, and the supplemental request gives them leverage, but they also run the risk of appearing opposed to aiding the troops.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held at the Marriott Wardman Park, Washington, DC, Thursday, February 9, 2012. The annual political conference draws thousands of supporters and prominent conservative figures. (Andrew Harnik / The Washington Times)

    Conservatives fancy the idea of a long nomination fight

    By Seth McLaughlin - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** U.S. Marine Sgt. Monica Perez (left) of San Diego helps Lance Cpl. Mary Shloss of Hammond, Ind., put on her head scarf before heading out on a patrol in the village of Khwaja Jamal in the Helmand province of Afghanistan in August 2009. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson, File)

    Pentagon to move women closer to front lines

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • A worker leaves with a moving box Wednesday at Solyndra in Fremont, Calif. The solar-panel manufacturer, which received a $535 million loan from the U.S. government, has announced layoffs of 1,100 workers and plans to file for bankruptcy. A weak economy and strong overseas competition have proved insurmountable. (Associated Press)

    Republicans accuse White House of Solyndra stonewall

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now