




Will she or won’t she?
Bill Clinton tantalized a Democratic audience in California Tuesday night with a suggestion that his wife, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has said she won’t run for president next year, might change her mind after all.
This set off a new round of Hillary chatter yesterday among Democrats who say the current field has not yielded a breakaway candidate.
“That’s really a decision for her to make,” Mr. Clinton told a forum in Monterey, Calif., as quoted in the Salinas Californian, which suggested that the former president was only trying to turn the question aside.
However, Mr. Clinton further said his wife has been urged by her New York constituents to run for president next year.
The new Hillary buzz followed the news that several of Mr. Clinton’s campaign and presidential aides are lining up behind retired Gen. Wesley Clark’s new bid for the Democratic nomination, together with published speculation that Mr. Clark would be Mrs. Clinton’s choice for a running mate.
Mrs. Clinton, a Democrat serving her first term as senator, has said she will serve the full term and consistently rejected the notion that she’s planning a run next year. Late last month, she made her most definitive statement: “I am absolutely ruling it out.”
Some analysts say Mrs. Clinton doesn’t need a surrogate to keep a place for her. Says Ron Faucheux, editor of Campaigns & Elections magazine: “If she got in, she would be by far the front-runner, and she doesn’t have to have someone stalk for her.”
Several things must happen, in this view, for Mrs. Clinton to join the race. Black leaders and labor union officials, who have been prominent in backing her in New York, would have to ask her to run, and several candidates already in the race would have to drop out.
“All of that is still possible under the right circumstances. It’s not likely, but it’s still possible,” he said.
Other analysts say Mrs. Clinton probably would use up her capital in clearing out other Democrats, making it tough for her to try again later if she failed in 2004.
One pollster says he hasn’t heard of Mrs. Clinton commissioning any surveys to evaluate her chances, though he said one firm had done a poll on its own during the summer that showed voters would prefer that Mrs. Clinton wait until 2008 to run for president.
National polls taken before Mr. Clark entered the race show Mrs. Clinton topping the primary field of potential Democratic candidates, and losing to President Bush in the general election.
Morris Reid, a political strategist who served in the Commerce Department under Secretary Ron Brown, says Mrs. Clinton must win Senate re-election in 2006 to build a record.
View Entire StoryBy Julia A. Seymour
Planned Parenthood flap preceded by assault from anti-chemical activists

By Rich Campbell - The Washington Times
Imagine this: Peyton Manning coming out of the tunnel at FedEx Field this September, poised ...

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
When Lt. j.g. Timothy W. Dorsey fired his fighter jet’s missile at an Air Force ...

By Paige Winfield Cunningham - The Washington Times
Pointing to growing unease that President Obama’s proposed contraception coverage rule doesn’t protect religious freedom ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.

You don’t have to be a super-parent to make baby happy. Get pointers on parenting tips to make life easier.

An inside look at the world highlighting not only green issues affecting us all, but everything from green travel to green technology.