- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
A Senate Judiciary Committee lawyer urged Sen. Edward M. Kennedy to use the judicial-confirmation process to affect an affirmative-action case to which she once had been a party.
When Olati Johnson worked as a lawyer for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), she represented students supporting the University of Michigan's affirmative-action program in the landmark court case that decided the constitutionality of race-based preferences in university admissions programs.
As the case journeyed toward the Supreme Court, Ms. Johnson quit the NAACP and became a lawyer on the Senate Judiciary Committee for Mr. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat.
There, in April 2002, she and Mr. Kennedy's chief legal counsel urged the influential Judiciary Committee member to stall a conservative nominee to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals until after that panel had ruled on the University of Michigan case.
"The thinking is that the current 6th Circuit will sustain the affirmative-action program, but if a new judge with conservative views is confirmed before the case is decided, that new judge will be able, under 6th Circuit rules, to review the case and vote on it," Ms. Johnson wrote to Mr. Kennedy in a memo obtained by The Washington Times.
Neither Ms. Johnson nor former chief counsel Melody Barnes still work for Mr. Kennedy.
"That is a stunning development," Sen. Jeff Sessions, Alabama Republican and member of the Judiciary Committee said yesterday. "If she was a party to that lawsuit, I am shocked and stunned that she would take action that had a direct impact on the outcome of that historic case of national importance."
Tennessee Judge Julia S. Gibbons -- the nominee in question -- was not confirmed until after the panel upheld the University of Michigan Law School's racial-preferences program on a 5-4 vote. But Democrats blame a Republican senator for the delay.
Jeffrey Mazzella, director of the Center for Individual Freedom, asked for an official inquiry into the matter by the Senate.
"The cloud of corruption hanging over Senator Kennedy and his office is growing darker," Mr. Mazzella said. "If the Senate ethics committee does not immediately investigate and punish the shameful behavior detailed in the memo, then it can no longer maintain any credibility."









Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.