The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story

Democrats rip Cheney's record, tie wife's pregnancy to Vietnam

By

Originally published 12:03 a.m., April 27, 2004, updated 12:00 a.m., April 27, 2004

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

Democrats began a weeklong attack on Vice President Dick Cheney's record yesterday, with party chief Terry McAuliffe calling him "the last guy who should be lecturing John Kerry" and a Democrat-leaning group suggesting that Mr. Cheney's wife became pregnant to help her husband avoid serving in Vietnam.

Mr. McAuliffe, speaking at the Democratic National Committee headquarters in Washington, called Mr. Cheney "the Bush campaign's attack dog in chief," and questioned whether he had the credentials to make his speech yesterday criticizing Democratic presidential candidate Sen. John Kerry's voting record on defense -- policywise as well as personally.

"When he was secretary of defense, Dick Cheney consistently proposed massive cuts to weapons programs that our troops are using right now in Iraq," Mr. McAuliffe said, pointing to Mr. Cheney's support while defense secretary in the previous Bush administration for cutting the M-1 tank, the B-2 bomber, AH-64 Apache helicopters and the F-16 fighter.

Mr. McAuliffe then questioned Mr. Cheney's personal qualifications.

"You remember Dick Cheney," he said. "When John Kerry was risking his life for his country in Vietnam, Dick Cheney was getting deferments because, in his words, he had 'other priorities than military service.'"

The vice president has become the go-to man when President Bush's re-election campaign needs an authoritative voice to challenge Mr. Kerry on defense.

In a speech in Fulton, Mo., yesterday, the site of British Prime Minister Winston Churchill's 1946 "Iron Curtain" speech, the vice president said Mr. Kerry's voting record is a long trail of supporting defense and intelligence cuts.

But a Democratic strategist said that if Republicans are going to use Mr. Cheney, Democrats want to ensure that they call his credibility into question.

"It's push-back. The guy went out there today trying to whack Kerry on this. It's sort of a 'glass houses' type of situation," said the strategist, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Polls show that Mr. Cheney is slightly less popular than Mr. Bush and Mr. Kerry.

Continue reading 12Next

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments
Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. EXCLUSIVE: Israel declines to ask U.S. to OK Iran attack

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Passing unread laws
  2. HOLMES: Deja vu on dictators, double standards
  3. EDITORIAL: Return of the Black Panther
  4. Israeli know-how
  5. EDITORIAL: The fate of FedEx
  6. EDITORIAL: Dancing with the bear
  7. LETTER TO EDITOR: Coming to grips with Palestinian guilty trips
  8. Bloated deficits endanger dollar's global status
  9. EDITORIAL: Rewriting economic history
  10. YON: Girl with no future

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Related Stories

No easy answers

Fishy import plan risks trade war

Cheney fears U.S. troop pullout

For Christians, Vietnam war rages

Cheneys save hearts in D.C.

Bush, aides find voice on Obama policies

Lawsuits as a weapon

Judge wants Plame case notes on Cheney's FBI interview

Panetta: Cheney 'almost' as if 'wishing' for attack

Deeds starts fast in denigrating GOP

Poll

Do you think the G-8 is still effective in today's times?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.