- Article
- Comments ()
- Videos
A key opponent of legislation to overhaul the nation's intelligence apparatus yesterday agreed to support the bill, opening the door for a House floor vote this week.
Rep. Duncan Hunter, California Republican and House Armed Services Committee chairman, agreed to a compromise to alter the bill's language to protect the military chain of command's authority over wartime intelligence.
But the deal leaves out House conservatives who want the bill to crack down on illegal immigration and identification fraud, and they said yesterday that they expect the bill to pass over their objections. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, Texas Republican, said a floor vote could come as early as tomorrow.
"After working through the weekend with the vice president, several conferees and other members, we have come to an agreement on changed bill language that we believe protects with necessary clarity the time-tested chain of command," Mr. Hunter said in a joint statement with Sen. John W. Warner, Virginia Republican and Senate Armed Services Committee chairman.
"Pending a review of the rest of the legislation, we are prepared to support the bill as amended by this new language," the two men said in the statement.
The intelligence-reform bill was stalled Nov. 20 when Mr. Hunter and Rep. F. James Sensenbrenner Jr., Wisconsin Republican and House Judiciary Committee chairman, drew a line against the proposal.
Mr. Hunter said the bill gave the national intelligence director too much authority over the use of satellites that disseminate real-time intelligence to troops on the ground, and thus could hinder the military by forcing commanders to deal with an added layer of bureaucracy.
Mr. Sensenbrenner refused to allow passage of the bill unless it included his provisions to stop states from issuing driver's licenses to illegal aliens and another to limit the use of ID cards issued by foreign consulates as legal proof of identity.
Mr. Sensenbrenner reiterated his position yesterday, but Mr. Hunter's acquiescence means he likely will be sidestepped on the way to passing the legislation.
"Americans deserve a complete bill so that we can prevent another 9/11 from occurring," Mr. Sensenbrenner said. "Border security and immigration reform are vital components of our homeland security efforts, so why are they not included in this legislation?"









Post a comment
There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.