

Ohio’s governor says he will sign a measure passed by the General Assembly yesterday banning same-sex “marriages.”
Proponents say this move should discourage court challenges stemming from the Massachusetts high court ruling that homosexuals have a right to such unions.
“As things now stand, if another state has a law, you have to honor it. We don’t want Massachusetts to write the laws for Ohio,” said Bob Reed, a legislative aide for Rep. Mike Gilb, who is chairman of the Republican-controlled Ohio House of Representatives’ Committee on Juvenile and Family Law.
A 1934 U.S. Supreme Court decision requires states to recognize marriages from other states — in most circumstances.
Gov. Bob Taft, a Republican, will sign the bill by the Feb. 16 deadline, his spokesman, Orest Holubec, said yesterday. The House passed the bill 72-22 yesterday. The Senate, also dominated by Republicans, previously approved the bill by a narrower margin.
Mr. Reed said the legal need for the legislation is because of the “full faith and credit” clause of the Constitution.
“The clause says that states, by full faith and credit, must honor laws of other states, unless the home state has something different and a strong public policy” on that issue, Mr. Reed said yesterday.
Ohio’s bill is considered one of the toughest same-sex “marriage” bans in the United States, mainly because it prohibits state employees, regardless of sexual orientation, from getting marital benefits for unmarried partners.
The legislation, sponsored by Republican Rep. Bill Seitz, stipulates that same-sex “marriages” would be “against the strong public policy of the state.”
It also prohibits Ohio from recognizing any “public act or judicial proceeding” from any jurisdiction that provides the benefits of marriage to unwed couples.
Mr. Reed said existing state law says marriages are between a man and a woman, each at least 16 years old, who “are not nearer in kin than second cousins,” but that it was “not specifically clear” that homosexuals could not “marry.”
Seth Kilbourn, national field director of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest homosexual rights lobbying group, said, “The passage of this bill will do great damage to gay and lesbian couples and families in Ohio and deny them the security and benefits other couples enjoy.”
Mr. Kilbourn said the measure will be a “grave threat” both to homosexual and heterosexual couples in Ohio.
“We’ll look at all options to minimize the damage,” he said.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times
A 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday on accusations he planned to detonate a suicide ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A collection of Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. to the beyond

Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.