- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
Iran-vote results unlikely to please West
Question of the Day
Iran’s parliamentary elections tomorrow, heavily stacked against moderate reformers, are unlikely to produce major changes in foreign policy or please U.S. and European officials hoping to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.
Despite an agreement last year to open its clandestine nuclear-research network to international inspection, the next Iranian government will fiercely guard the country’s right to pursue a nuclear program that could one day produce a bomb, according to Mohammed Hadi Semati, a political scientist at Tehran University.
The nuclear program “has become something like what it is in Pakistan — a source of national pride,” said Mr. Semati, now a visiting fellow at the Washington-based Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
“Many Iranians think everything else in the last 20 years has gone wrong, but nukes are one thing we’ve done well,” he said.
Ahmad Tavakoli, a leader of the Coalition of Builders of Islamic Iran, a leading conservative faction, told reporters in Tehran last week that his party would “never cede Iran’s right to reach the highest levels of nuclear technology.”
Ali Massoud Ansari, an Iranian political analyst at the University of Exeter in England, said neither the reformists nor Iran’s religious hard-liners are likely to meet Bush administration demands on the nuclear programs.
“What you’re seeing in Iran today is a rise in secular nationalism that would make the old shah blush,” he said, referring to the pro-U.S. monarch ousted in the 1979 Islamic revolution. “Politicians of all stripes have to respond to that, and I don’t think even the moderates would be ready to give up Iran’s nuclear effort.”
Many see the vote for the 290-seat Majlis, Iran’s parliament, as a foregone conclusion after the conservative-dominated Guardian Council, an appointed political watchdog group, blacklisted more than 2,300 reformist candidates, including 80 incumbents, from running.
Depending on the turnout, conservative and hard-line parties are expected to grab at least a small majority of the seats in the next parliament. Moderates now hold more than two-thirds of the seats.
Reformist leaders have denounced the Guardian Council’s move as a “parliamentary coup,” but have been unable to persuade Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the country’s ultimate religious and political authority, to postpone the vote or allow more candidates to run.
Mr. Semati said reformist hopes of a large, popular backlash against the blacklisting have been unfulfilled, reflecting in part voter apathy over the failure of past reformist election victories to bring about major changes.
The Bush administration last week accused Iran of failing to live up to promises made in October to disclose all of its nuclear programs to international inspectors.
State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said yesterday that the parliamentary election “is not shaping up” as a way for the Iranian people to “choose their own government.”
“How [the vote] will affect our relations, we’ll just have to see,” he said.
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- Ted Nugent loses second casino gig for 'racist remarks'
- Let it roll: D.C. Council hits Las Vegas on taxpayer's dime, leaves $14,000 tab
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq