- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
- Tea Party Patriots call key GOP firing a declaration of war
Hamas eyes ‘emergency’ role
Question of the Day
GAZA CITY, Gaza Strip — Hamas and other militant groups are discussing the formation of an “emergency” government to take charge in the event of an Israeli evacuation of the Gaza Strip, said a leading Hamas spokesman.
Concerns that Hamas could step into a political vacuum in Gaza were on the agenda of a team of senior U.S. envoys who arrived yesterday to hear details of the Israeli “separation plan.” The State Department and National Security Council envoys were scheduled to meet today with Prime Minister Ariel Sharon, who has said that Israel might withdraw unilaterally from the Gaza Strip if there is no progress on the U.S.-sponsored “road map” peace initiative.
Palestinian officials tried yesterday to calm worries about a pullout. Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia told the Belgian parliament that the Palestinian Authority is ready to take control of Gaza, and Jibril Rajoub, the top security aide to authority leader Yasser Arafat, said he had received assurances from Hamas’ leaders that the Islamic fundamentalist group isn’t planning a takeover.
But Ghazi Hamid, who as editor of a Hamas-controlled weekly newspaper speaks for the party, told The Washington Times that the existing Palestinian leadership is too weak to cope with the upheaval of an Israeli pullout.”The [Palestinian Authority] cannot take responsibility in this situation and we should look to a new leadership that can run the situation,” he said.
“There is a dialogue among the Palestinian factions — Hamas, Islamic Jihad and Fatah — to create a new leadership. It’s kind of a temporary or emergency leadership. We need new leadership because we’ve spent 10 years under the current one and we’ve gotten nothing. The situation has deteriorated.”
Mr. Hamid said Hamas wouldn’t dare attempt a coup against Mr. Arafat, but he called for the establishment of a “collective leadership.” In the past, Hamas has refused offers from Mr. Arafat to join the government.
The details of Mr. Sharon’s withdrawal plan are hazy. The top-selling newspaper Yediot Ahronot said yesterday that Israel was gearing up to evacuate completely about 20 Jewish settlements in Gaza and hand over the property to some sort of international body.
Other reports have suggested that Israeli troops will patrol the enclaves after the evacuation of about 7,500 Israeli civilians in the 20 settlements.
The Bush administration is looking for clarification during the two days of meetings with Mr. Sharon and his aides. Assistant Secretary of State William Burns, NSC Deputy Director Stephen Hadley and NSC Middle East expert Elliot Abrams met with Mr. Sharon’s chief of staff, Dov Weissglass, yesterday ahead of talks with the prime minister today.
A State Department official who spoke on the condition of anonymity said the United States was concerned that any unilateral action by Mr. Sharon would lead Israel and the Palestinians into “uncharted territory.” Reports also have said that Israel is thinking of annexing parts of the West Bank, an idea the Bush administration opposes.
The U.S. envoys were expected to urge Mr. Sharon to negotiate the terms of any withdrawal with Mr. Arafat to ensure an orderly transition, but Israeli television commentators said last night that the prime minister would insist on acting unilaterally.
“Whatever is done, we want to see it done as part of the road map. Everyone has pronounced the road map as dead, but we at the State Department have not, nor has [President Bush,]” said Paul Patin, a spokesman for the U.S. Embassy.
“All things being equal, we’re against unilateral actions and favor negotiations. Having said that, we’re not against all unilateral actions at all times.
By Matt Kibbe
The short-term deal will assure long-term overspending
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- All-out war breaks out in GOP over budget pact
- Biden guarantees victory on immigration reform
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Jane Fonda Foundation fails to make single contribution in 5 years: report
- White House improvises again on patchy Obamacare rollout
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Chef Mary Moran discusses the food we eat, where it comes from and what it does for us.
An informed and often humorous take on the world of advertising, public relations and social media. 100% Pure. Not from concentrate.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow