Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Governors skittish over same-sex ‘marriage’ issue

The nation’s governors are treading gingerly on same-sex “marriage,” but several in both parties say it will be impossible to duck the issue in this election year.

Democrats say Republicans are using the issue to divide Americans.

“We don’t need to make this into a wedge issue, but it’s becoming a wedge issue,” Gov. Bill Richardson, New Mexico Democrat, said on “Fox News Sunday.”

Appearing on the same program, Mississippi’s Republican governor denied the charge.

“No, look, the Republicans — nobody’s making a wedge issue out of this,” said Gov. Haley Barbour, a former Reagan administration official and former head of the Republican National Committee.

Mr. Richardson, Mr. Barbour and other governors are in Washington for the annual National Governors Association meeting, which concludes tomorrow. Yesterday, a Republican pollster told the governors that same-sex “marriages” will remain a top issue through November.

“This is going to be part of the 2004 campaign, and it’s going to be hard for anyone running for any substantial office not to have to deal with this issue,” pollster Bill McInturf said. He said a December study he conducted with Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg found voters almost 2-to-1 against homosexual “marriage” and noted that President Bush had a 15 percentage-point advantage on the issue.

In criticizing efforts to extend the definition of marriage to include homosexual couples, Republican governors emphasized the rule of law, rather than the morality of the issue.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom set a dangerous precedent when he ordered the city on Feb. 12 to begin issuing licenses for same-sex unions in defiance of the state’s ban on homosexual “marriages.”

“We have to stay within the law,” the Republican actor-turned-governor said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” yesterday. “There’s a state law that says specific things, and if you want to challenge those laws, then you can go to the court.”

The San Francisco precedent might spark a national trend, said several governors who cited a New Mexico case in which a county clerk began issuing “marriage” licenses to same-sex couples last week before the state attorney general put a stop to it.

Mr. Richardson said he supported the action by his state’s attorney general, but also said he opposes amending the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex “marriage.”

State and local battles over the issue could have national political impact for both parties. Mr. Barbour told Fox News yesterday he would be interested to hear what Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, would have to say about a continuing legal conflict that began in his state.

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last year ordered the state legislature to sanction same-sex “marriages,” saying that denial of legal recognition to such unions violates the Massachusetts constitution.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now