


The nation’s governors are treading gingerly on same-sex “marriage,” but several in both parties say it will be impossible to duck the issue in this election year.
Democrats say Republicans are using the issue to divide Americans.
“We don’t need to make this into a wedge issue, but it’s becoming a wedge issue,” Gov. Bill Richardson, New Mexico Democrat, said on “Fox News Sunday.”
Appearing on the same program, Mississippi’s Republican governor denied the charge.
“No, look, the Republicans — nobody’s making a wedge issue out of this,” said Gov. Haley Barbour, a former Reagan administration official and former head of the Republican National Committee.
Mr. Richardson, Mr. Barbour and other governors are in Washington for the annual National Governors Association meeting, which concludes tomorrow. Yesterday, a Republican pollster told the governors that same-sex “marriages” will remain a top issue through November.
“This is going to be part of the 2004 campaign, and it’s going to be hard for anyone running for any substantial office not to have to deal with this issue,” pollster Bill McInturf said. He said a December study he conducted with Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg found voters almost 2-to-1 against homosexual “marriage” and noted that President Bush had a 15 percentage-point advantage on the issue.
In criticizing efforts to extend the definition of marriage to include homosexual couples, Republican governors emphasized the rule of law, rather than the morality of the issue.
California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom set a dangerous precedent when he ordered the city on Feb. 12 to begin issuing licenses for same-sex unions in defiance of the state’s ban on homosexual “marriages.”
“We have to stay within the law,” the Republican actor-turned-governor said on NBC’s “Meet the Press” yesterday. “There’s a state law that says specific things, and if you want to challenge those laws, then you can go to the court.”
The San Francisco precedent might spark a national trend, said several governors who cited a New Mexico case in which a county clerk began issuing “marriage” licenses to same-sex couples last week before the state attorney general put a stop to it.
Mr. Richardson said he supported the action by his state’s attorney general, but also said he opposes amending the U.S. Constitution to ban same-sex “marriage.”
State and local battles over the issue could have national political impact for both parties. Mr. Barbour told Fox News yesterday he would be interested to hear what Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination, would have to say about a continuing legal conflict that began in his state.
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court last year ordered the state legislature to sanction same-sex “marriages,” saying that denial of legal recognition to such unions violates the Massachusetts constitution.
View Entire StoryBy Timothy Stanley
Pat's suspension completes liberal network's divorce from reality

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...

By Susan Crabtree - The Washington Times
Six members of the House Ethics Committee including its chairman have recused themselves from any ...

By Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
President Obama purchased lunch at a San Francisco restaurant that serves shark fin soup, after ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A collection of Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. to the beyond

First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.