Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

The Clark tax-increase scheme

“Restoring progressivity” to the federal income-tax code was the first goal identified in retired Gen. Wesley Clark’s Families First Tax Reform, which he unveiled last week. Mr. Clark promised to “shift the tax burden” to those “with the most to spare.” As a recent IRS report revealed, however, the nation’s income-tax system already is quite progressive.

The top 1 percent, while earning 20.8 percent of income in 2000, paid more than 37 percent of total federal income taxes. The top 10 percent paid 67 percent of income taxes on 46 percent of total income. That is the definition of progressivity. Indeed, half the nation’s taxpayers paid less than 4 percent of income taxes in 2001. Given that a married couple with two children earning $40,000 in 2003 will owe the IRS less than $50 in income taxes, Mr. Clark should understand the simple concept of progressivity.

Of course, Mr. Clark has no intention of “restoring progressivity.” What he clearly wishes to do is to make the nation’s indisputably progressive tax system much steeper. An apt description for such a plan is class warfare. The retired general undoubtedly hopes that his politicized arithmetic will pay huge electoral dividends, even as he seeks to virtually triple the top tax rate on stock dividends from 15 percent to 44.6 percent.

The scheme is simple: Maximize the number of people who would qualify for tax relief, while minimizing the number of people required to pay for it, thus maintaining ostensible revenue neutrality.

Mr. Clark’s plan would effectively raise the tax-free income level of two-parent-two-child families from today’s $40,000 to $50,000, expecting to fold millions of quintessentially middle-class voters into the Democratic column. Similarly sized families earning $85,000 per year would receive a tax cut of nearly $1,000. Promising income-tax relief to all taxpayers with children earning up to $100,000, Mr. Clark reckons that the typical family with children will receive a tax cut of about $1,500. More than 30 million families would see their taxes cut. In his seemingly unending quest for votes, he also promises “tax relief” to another 15 million families that either already pay no income taxes or receive substantial “refunds” through the widely abused earned-income tax credit program.

As part of his 10-year, $1.1 trillion tax increase, Mr. Clark previously pledged to raise the top income-tax rate to 39.6 percent from the current top rate of 35 percent, which happens to be 7 percentage points higher than the top rate established by the 1986 bipartisan reform effort. Now he will be raising the top rate by another 5 percentage points, to 44.6 percent. Mr. Clark pledges that the latest rate increase will apply to only the top 0.1 percent of tax filers. In his lexicon, they have “the most to spare.” In reality, they have the most to invest.

Mr. Clark is exposing his “Old Democrat” biases. History shows that class envy doesn’t play well in American politics, except perhaps in Democratic primaries.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Texas Rep. Ron Paul, who is running for the GOP presidential nomination, poses for a photo with a youth as voters attend their caucus at Coon Rapids Middle School in Coon Rapids, Minn., on Tuesday night, Feb. 7, 2012. (AP Photo/The Star Tribune, Jeff Wheeler)

    Santorum sweep: Wins Missouri, Minnesota, Colorado

    By Valerie Richardson and Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times

  • U.S. Customs and Border Protection uses qualified pilots to operate Predator drones for surveillance along the border. Under the FAA Reauthorization Act, drones eventually could be used by police agencies and private companies across the U.S. (Associated Press)

    Drones over U.S. get OK by Congress

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • Supporters of gay marriage celebrate outside the James R. Browning United States Courthouse in San Francisco on Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012, after a federal appeals court declared California's ban on same-sex marriage unconstitutional. (AP Photo/San Francisco Chronicle, Lea Suzuki)

    Appeals court rules Calif. gay-marriage ban unconstitutional

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Rich like me

          An establishmentarian conservative, short on cash, but long on wisdom.

          A President for the People

          T.J. O'Hara has joined the political ring, declaring his candidacy for President. If you agree America is in need of solutions rather than political tactics, his is a message worth reading.