Agency use of informants questioned

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

EL PASO, Texas -- An unusual narcotics slaying in neighboring Juarez, Mexico, last summer has law-enforcement officials here and in Washington, D.C., asking serious questions about the role of government agencies in handling undercover informants.

Many are critical after disclosures about how the U.S. government failed to halt the killing of a suspected drug dealer in Juarez.

The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was informed of the "hit" two days beforehand, and handlers and officials listened to the killing of Fernando Reyes Aguado via a cell phone used by the informant, according to a leaked in-house report.

Sources close to the El Paso ICE office say the informant, known by the alias Jesus Contreras, or Agent 913, entered the U.S. Witness Protection Program. They say he might have been involved in five or six other killings.

He reportedly was paid more than $75,000.

"We cannot allow an agent of the federal government to commit a murder," said Phil Jordan, retired Drug Enforcement Administration supervisor. "There's no way to justify it."

ICE officials refused comment, other than to say the matter was under review by the agency's Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR).

Some "bad blood" between ICE and the DEA remains, sources told The Washington Times, because Contreras was once involved in an aborted attempt to kill two DEA agents in Juarez. Some DEA agents think ICE was aware of the scheme.

Though the original investigation began with concerns about the Aug. 5, 2003, murder of Reyes, according to federal officials, the investigation has intensified into areas that eventually might change the operational regulations for ICE's dealing with informants.

Reyes' tortured body was found along with 11 others buried in the yard of a Juarez house in January. ICE agents -- via their informant -- had tipped off Mexican authorities, even supplying the address.