Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Iran’s nuclear menace

LONDON.

The myth of protection offered by global antiproliferation regimes — including the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty and Fissile Materials Cutoff Treaty — was shattered last month when investigators for the International Atomic Energy Agency began unraveling a clandestine nuclear black market network run by a Pakistani metallurgist, Abdul Qadeer Khan.

Iran, Libya and North Korea were primary recipients of Pakistan’s nuclear technology. Other countries and terrorist groups may yet be exposed as clients of Mr. Khan’s network.

But nowhere has the damage done by Mr. Khan’s illicit activities been more apparent than in Iran, where sham elections two weekends ago returned hard-liners to power, and where now the real possibility exists of nuclear tests being conducted without political opposition.

Iran’s mullahs have longed for nuclear bombs since coming to power in 1980. Their pacifying statements and superficial compliance with IAEA inspection teams are masking an unrelenting drive to buy time for their scientists to complete work on the first Shi’ite Islamic bomb.

There is not a minute to waste in stopping them. With centrifuge technology far more advanced than previously believed, Iran’s scientists have been frantically working away on obtaining critical bomb fuel with as many as three separate programs. The first employs the P-1 centrifuges transferred by Mr. Khan’s network, as well as the far more sophisticated P-2 centrifuges recently revealed to be in Iran’s possession.

The second track makes use of Belarus-Russian filtering and high-temperature melting technologies for uranium enrichment. These facts were revealed by Ahmad Shirzad, a member of Iran’s Parliament representing Isfahan, in late 2003 as he passionately argued Iran’s children were starving while the mullahs processed uranium at secret underground facilities near Parchin (southeast of Tehran) and in the mountains between Qazvin and Karaj (northwest of Tehran).

The third program, in its early stages of development, uses Chinese chemical separation formulas to separate plutonium from Russian-supplied spent uranium fuel rods. Add to these three parallel enrichment programs recently uncovered evidence Tehran possesses Polonium, a key catalyst for fissionable reactions, as well as blueprints to build Chinese-style implosion nuclear devices and that the mullahs are hosting a large contingent of Georgian atomic scientists (first revealed by deposed President Eduard Shevardnadze late last year) and it becomes difficult to believe Iran’s nuclear program is for “peaceful purposes only.”

Strong measures are needed urgently to deal with the growing threat posed by rogue nations and nonstate actors to deal with the proliferation of radiological materials, or worse, when combined with sophisticated plastic explosives — miniaturized “dirty” bombs.

We should start immediately by pressuring Pakistan, where all this started, to provide a fuller picture of Tehran’s current nuclear capabilities.

CIA Director George Tenet’s recent secret visit to Pakistan, reported in the press last week, to begin applying such pressure was a good start. We can only hope his interrogation of Mr. Khan filled in important blanks about who exactly bought what from Pakistan’s brazenly glitzy nuclear brochures.

Pakistan’s President Pervez Musharraf had promised complete transparency when his scientists were caught red-handed in their nuclear mischief. He has good reason to comply with U.S. requests to smoke out the Iranian program because ironically, it was Iran’s mullahs who first revealed the extent of Mr. Khan’s illegal transfers to IAEA inspectors.

Mr. Tenet and others in the business of preventing proliferation need to urgently find out from Pakistan whether other vital components for building atomic weapons (detonation switches, spherical bomb casings, simulators to model implosion data, testing software, etc) also were transferred by Mr. Khan’s network to Iran’s scientists.

The Pakistani data, if made fully available, would enable U.S. diplomats, including Secretary of State Colin Powell, to demand intrusive inspections in Iran of the type Col. Moammar Gadhafi was forced to accept when faced with undeniable evidence of Libya’s nuclear guilt last December. It could also empower the U.S. to build a coalition of nations to bring sufficient diplomatic, economic and military pressure to bear upon Tehran’s mullahs to totally dismantle their nuclear program.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • **FILE** Director of National Intelligence James Clapper (Associated Press)

    Sanctions may be changing Iran’s nuke plans

    By Shaun Waterman - The Washington Times

  • David Wilmot, a power player in the District, is using a program to aid the economically disadvantaged to win contracts. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Top D.C. lobbyist says he deserves special aid

    By Jeffrey Anderson - The Washington Times

  • Washington state Gov. Chris Gregoire is surrounded by legislators and others Monday as she signs into law a bill legalizing same-sex marriage. The law is to take effect June 7, but opponents are mounting a repeal effort. (Associated Press)

    Washington ballot best chance for foes of same-sex marriage

    By Valerie Richardson - The Washington Times

  • Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          The Political Pro-Con

          Not your typical discussion, writer Conor Murphy writes about the cons, and pros, of politics

          A Heart Without Compromise; Advocating for Children

          Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.