Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Europe and its farm subsidies

EU Trade Commissioner Pascal Lamy resorted to defensive posturing prior to negotiations about agricultural trade this week in Geneva. Mr. Lamy had few other cards to play, since Europe’s politicians gave him little to offer at the talks. Mr. Lamy’s stance reflects the more focused pressure on Europe lately, due in large part to America’s growing flexibility on the issue.

Mr. Lamy recently fired off a letter to World Trade Organization (WTO) chief Supachai Panitchpakdi, accusing the trade arbiter of distorting data on farm subsidies. Mr. Supachai earlier this year claimed that developed countries provide their farmers with about $300 billion worth of these subsidies.

Besides these recriminations, there was little excitement in Geneva. The only breakthrough was an agreement to hold another round of talks starting April 20 and to try to reach a framework accord on farm goods before the end of the summer. Europe and Japan can be roundly blamed for the impasse.

Washington can also be fairly criticized as a big subsidizer of the U.S. agricultural industry. But since the disastrous trade round in Cancun last year, it has demonstrated a greater interest in moving away from subsidies. “We are going to have to find a way of setting an end date for export subsidies. That means that the EU needs to be brought along in the process,” said U.S. trade negotiator Allen Johnson.

The more detailed the data on farm subsidies, the more egregious EU policy looks. According to a recent study by Tim Josling, a senior fellow at the Stanford Institute for International Studies, and Dale Hathaway, senior fellow at the National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, EU spending accounted for nearly 90 percent of the $36 billion that WTO members spent between 1995 and 2000 on export subsidies — considered by poor countries to be very damaging to their own farm exports. The United States spent about 2 percent of that amount. Also, U.S. tariffs, which average 12 percent, are lower than Japan’s (33 percent), the European Union’s (30 percent) and Canada’s (24 percent), according to the study. Poor countries tend to have much higher average tariffs, but these figures don’t reflect rich countries’ “mega-tariffs” on certain goods, such as tariffs of 116 percent on dairy products.

This trade round, which was geared to benefit poor countries, hinges on progress on agricultural trade. Developing countries must also reciprocate with liberalization, but they have little incentive to do so without reform of rich countries’ farm policies.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • (Associated Press photographs)

    Worried conservatives descend on Washington’s CPAC

    By Ralph Z. Hallow - The Washington Times

  • Retired Army Gen. Jack Keane

    General: ‘Use drones to kill’ the Taliban in Pakistan

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • **FILE** An auction sign is shown outside the Fremont, Calif., headquarters for bankrupt solar company Solyndra headquarters on Oct. 31, 2011, before the auction on the following day. Solyndra received a $500 million loan guarantee from the government before filing for bankruptcy in September. (Associated Press)

    Solyndra sold assets cheap for fast cash

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Haydon's Soccer and Sports Pitch

          Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.

          Payne-Full Living

          Join Matt on weekly adventures in all forms as he pushes past his comfort levels in an attempt to stimulate the body, mind and soul.