The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out
  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Customer Service
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
    • Editorials
    • Commentary
    • Columns
    • Water Cooler
    • Letters
    • Cartoons
    • Books
  • Sports
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Communities
  • Rebate Shopping
    • Stores
    • Coupons
    • Daily Double
    • Promotion
    • How It Works
  • Photos
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Audio and Radio
    • America's Morning News
  • Politics

    CBO feels crush of health care requests

  • Politics

    Illinois GOP borrows Brown's strategy in bid to grab Obama seat

  • National

    State Dept. defends $450K for Venice exhibitions

  • National

    Medical pot lights up D.C. debate

  • World

    Netanyahu woos Obama after name-calling fracas

  • Politics

    Kucinich will vote for health care reform

  • Politics

    Obama team takes heat over unemployment

Tuesday, May 18, 2004

U.S. considers reactor deal with North Korea

Rate this story

Average 0.00
after 0 votes
Login or register to rate this story

  • Font Size -+
  • Print
  • Email
  • Comment
  • Tweet this!
  • Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Click-2-Listen

More Stories

  • Bernanke lobbies to keep control of banking oversight
  • Group condemns textbooks about Islam
  • Kucinich drops opposition to health care bill
  • Obama dismisses procedural tactics in health debate

By

The United States said it would consider again supplying North Korea with a light-water nuclear reactor as part of recent talks in Beijing, according to Bush administration officials.

The discussion came during a meeting at the six-party talks last week between Joseph DeTrani, the top U.S. representative to the talks, and his North Korean counterpart, Ri Gun.

"The North Koreans raised it," said one official, speaking on the condition of anonymity. "They said, 'If we address the [highly enriched uranium] program, what would that mean for the light-water reactor program?'"

The private discussion, part of the working group talks on North Korea's nuclear arms program, also was the first time since 2002 that North Koreans acknowledged their covert uranium-based nuclear program. Publicly, North Korea has denied having a uranium-enrichment program.

Mr. DeTrani responded in the talks that providing the light-water reactor is possible and could be "one element" of a U.S. policy response, if the North Koreans abandoned their nuclear arms program.

However, Mr. DeTrani informed North Koreans that before the reactor deal could be discussed, Pyongyang would have to rejoin the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and permit International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors to return to monitor North Korean nuclear activities.

North Korea pulled out of the nonproliferation accord in January 2003 and expelled IAEA inspectors in December 2002.

The United States, Japan and South Korea agreed to provide North Korea with two light-water reactors as part of the 1994 Agreed Framework, negotiated by the Clinton administration. The reactors -- which use ordinary water instead of "heavy water" containing the hydrogen isotope deuterium -- are designed to be less useful for making nuclear weapons.

The 1994 agreement was supposed to have halted Pyongyang's development of nuclear arms but was abandoned after North Korea's disclosure to a U.S. diplomat in October 2002 that it was working on uranium enrichment, a process that would allow North Korea to produce fuel for nuclear bombs.

The agreement called for supplying the reactors and fuel oil to North Korea but was put on hold after the disclosure of the secret uranium-enrichment effort. Concrete was poured for the foundation of the first reactor in August 2002. Construction was suspended -- but not canceled -- in December 2002.

123Next »

Post a comment

There are comments on this article, submit your opinion!

Commenting is disabled for this entry.
If you feel there is still something worth mentioning about this entry please contact the author or the site admin.

Top Stories

Most Shared

  1. EDITORIAL: Obama nominee's sympathy for sexual sadists
  2. WOLF: Obama family health care fracas
  3. Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says
  4. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  5. FITTON: Secret mortgage politics
More Top Stories »
  1. Iran's link to China includes nukes, missiles
  2. White House urged to end Israel row on settlements
  3. CROWLEY: What Democrats are really saying
  4. WOLF: Questions for your representative
  5. EDITORIAL: Mrs. Clinton's hissy fit

Most Commented

  1. E-mails suggested Fort Hood suspect subpar for Army
  2. Obama hones final health care pitch
  3. Temporary foreign workers threaten immigration deal
  4. Tehran aiding al Qaeda links, Petraeus says
  5. Kucinich will vote for health care reform
More Top Stories »
  1. White House urged to end Israel row on settlements
  2. Napolitano shifts policy on border fence
  3. Poll: Fewer people worry about warming
  4. Obama team takes heat over unemployment
  5. 'Self-executing rule' decried as a 'trick'

Listen to Washington Times Radio

  • America's Morning News

    with John McCaslin

Blogs & Columns

  • Water Cooler

    CBO numbers will change everything--again

  • Belief Blog

    Sayonara to the president's faith-based council

  • Technology

    Ordering iPad is painless, except for the wallet hit

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.