



For several years in the personal computer business, it seemed as if $2,500 or so was the “sweet spot” in pricing.
Ante up that kind of moolah, the thinking went, and you were sure to get one of the more powerful computers around, one that wouldn’t go stale before you got it home from the store.
On the Windows side, prices are much lower.
You can spend about $1,500 to get a spiffy desktop PC; even $800 will buy a system that’s more than enough for most users’ needs, we’re told.
You can even get a decent notebook PC for that same $1,500, if not less.
So is it absurd to spend $2,500 on a desktop computer?
Well, that depends on who you are and what you want to do. If, like me, you are an Apple Macintosh fan, the $2,500 invested in a dual-processor Power Mac G5, with the CPU chips running at 1.8 GHz is not a totally bad idea.
The Power PC G5 chip, introduced to much fanfare last year, is a 64-bit processor and delivers what Apple calls “an exponential increase” in the machine’s computing power.
The 64-bit PowerPC G5 processor architecture lets the Power Mac G5 handle more tasks more quickly, as well as support up to 8GB of main memory — four times more than a typical PC. As I’ve often said before, the more RAM, the better.
My test unit of the Power Mac G5 boasts a little less than 8GB of RAM, but it certainly has enough to handle my daily needs.
The two processors cut through tough tasks with ease, and this computer is whisper quiet. (I’ve become accustomed to the whirring of the fan in the dual-processor Power Mac G4 that sits at my day job, but quieter is better.)
There are ports on the front and back of the unit for 800 Mbps and 400 Mbps Fire Wire connectors, as well as USB cables. The front-side ports — something else missing from last year’s G4s — make it super easy to hook up a digital camera or other device on an ad hoc basis.
And, frankly, you haven’t lived till you’ve transferred the contents of a digital camera to your desktop machine via Fire Wire — it’s very fast.
But I’ll admit that I’m not someone who does a lot of video- or audio- editing and manipulation. I don’t have any software that is specifically designed to take advantage of the dual processors, at least none that I’m aware of.
So is the power and performance of the machine wasted in my home office? You could argue that, but I’d say no.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Chris Kahn - Associated Press
Gasoline prices have never been higher this time of the year. At $3.53 a gallon, ...

By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times
The defense rested its case in the murder trial of George W. Huguely V on ...

By Tom Howell Jr. - The Washington Times
A 29-year-old Moroccan man was arrested Friday on accusations he planned to detonate a suicide ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities