

The nation’s turtlelike march toward HDTV domination sure is a head scratcher.
Take a country obsessed with television, introduce a new technology that makes current televised images look blurry by comparison … and watch the visual revolution commence, right?
Not so fast.
Thanks to an imperfect storm of economic forces and government foot-dragging, the revolution has been delayed. A mere 4.1 million digital TVs were purchased last year, according to Jeff Joseph, vice president of communications with the Arlington-based Consumer Electronics Association. (Roughly 88 percent of those digital sets were HDTV-ready models.) Currently, 12 million households have an HDTV set, a market penetration of less than 10 percent.
Phillip Swann, president and publisher of Arlington-based sites www.onhd.tv and www.tvpredictions.com, says the two major obstacles are price and programming.
“Right now, you can go in and get a 52-inch set for $1,299,” says Mr. Swann, whose onhd.tv features a cheeky list of celebrities whose mugs look better — and worse — in high definition (see sidebar). “That’s not bad, but it’s been a while to get to that price point. In the minds of most consumers, HDTV is still too expensive.”
Price may be moot as long as too few networks program enough HDTV-friendly shows. Fewer than 20 networks now broadcast in high definition, Mr. Swann says. Why shell out double or triple the cost of your current TV set to catch only a handful of programs that take advantage of HDTV’s marvels? Moreover, the quality of those broadcasts continues to vary, a further disincentive to would-be HDTV converts.
The recent Olympic coverage showed how frustrating such programming can be, Mr. Swann says. NBC couldn’t justify the costs involved in broadcasting the games live in high definition, so it did so only on a delayed basis.
The network promises the 2006 Winter Games will be a different story, but even the limited glimpses offered this year showed just how wondrous HDTV visuals can be.
HDTV can sell itself to gadget fiends and tech heads, but that doesn’t necessarily convert into mainstream appeal.
Digital-based HDTV serves up a whopping 1,080 horizontal lines for us to view, compared with a regular analog set’s 525. Programming quality can change those numbers and how they look on screen, but industry experts say HDTV can offer images at least five times more detailed than those of today’s sets.
Those numbers aren’t complicated, but the overall TV scene sure is. Just walk into any electronics store and ask to see the latest and greatest television sets.
You’ll be bombarded with plasma, LCD and rear-projection models, plus standard cathode ray sets and a half-dozen other innovations that could cause Regan-style head spinning.
Add to that the differences between analog television, the current standard, and enhanced-definition television, the next step up, and the HDTV picture gets even muddier.
Did we mention some HDTV sets come ready out of the box, while others require the purchase of an HDTV receiver?
View Entire StoryPresident is violating religious freedom for an ineffective plan

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
Navy Secretary Ray Mabus, under fire from Congress and veterans for naming ships after fellow ...

By Tim Devaney - The Washington Times
Rick Berman has a black baseball cap with the words “Dr. Evil” in his K ...

By Sean Lengell and Dave Boyer - The Washington Times
Congressional leaders told their lawmakers Tuesday night they’ve reached a tentative deal to extend the ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Immerse yourselves in the genius insights of a high school sports freak and statistical wizard who knows it all. Or at least thinks he does.

Health care reform, organized medicine, physician practice management, and patient care--a real time look at the challenges facing doctors and patients in America today.