Ballpark issues divide council

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen

By

A Major League Baseball team may be destined to take the field in the District, but where that ballpark will be and who will pay for it is far from a done deal.

Proponents of baseball are confident they have enough votes on the D.C. Council to pass a public financing package to build a $440 million ballpark on the Anacostia River waterfront in Southeast -- a plan that helped convince baseball officials to move the Expos to the nation's capital.

But dissension among council members appeared to be growing yesterday, and three new council members taking office in January could tilt the balance against the mayor.

And some community groups are scrambling to rally opposition to the Southeast location, calling for organizational meetings and accusing Mayor Anthony A. Williams and baseball proponents of forcing black residents out of the Southeast neighborhood considered the most likely site for a new stadium.

"With every single project ever been done in this city, you are always going to have people who are against it," Mr. Williams said yesterday at his weekly press briefing. "It is not my goal to achieve unanimity in the city. If my goal were to achieve unanimity in the city for every project in this city, we would never have done anything."

Mr. Williams said his stadium plan would not divert city dollars from schools, parks or social programs.

And, he said, the new ballpark would help spur a renaissance around the proposed stadium site near M and South Capitol streets SE. The facility would replace about 60 properties in what is now largely a warehouse district.

"[T]his is something that benefits everyone in the city, benefits our individual neighborhoods in the city, certainly benefits the people on the Anacostia waterfront in a way that does not take from other city obligations and in a way that does not levy a tax on the residents of the city," Mr. Williams said.

At least four members of the D.C. Council support the mayor's plan and three staunchly oppose footing the stadium bill. The rest of the 13 council members remain undecided on public financing.

However, even the stadium naysayers claim to embrace the return of baseball to the District after a 33-year absence.