



LONDON.
Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf is in New Delhi today to attend an India-Pakistan cricket match.
Weightier matters, however, have been on his agenda since arriving in the Indian capital — moving the peace process forward over Kashmir’s future chief among them. Making Kashmir’s embattled residents central to the search for peace is the best route toward a durable solution to an issue that three times has embroiled these nuclear powers in war.
There has been a series of transformational events in South Asia in the last month in the run-up to Mr. Musharraf’s cricket tour that makes peace genuinely attainable. U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice’s visit to the region in mid-March sparked a major policy shift in Washington when the Bush administration announced it would sell non-nuclear capable F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan and make available to India advanced F-18s and other strategic military assets.
The jet sale calms Islamabad’s blustery generals who can now find solace in restored conventional arms parity with their stronger neighbor. Now perhaps they can give peace efforts in Kashmir a real chance by withdrawing support for a militant insurgency aimed at destabilizing New Delhi. Certainly, the F-16 deal reduces Mr. Musharraf’s reliance on his nuclear arsenal as the only way to ensure Pakistan’s national security.
India’s prime minister, the ever-pragmatic Manmohan Singh, made the requisite noises for domestic political consumption about its nuclear neighbor getting the weapons to start a nuclear war. Then he opened bus service between Indian-controlled Kashmir’s capital, Srinagar, and Pakistani-controlled Kashmir’s main city, Muzaffarabad. It wasn’t easy to reunite Kashmir’s battered families after an almost 20-year insurgency. Insurgents blew up the station the first bus departed from and hurled grenades as the bus crossed the bridge to Pakistan.
But the bus trip paled in comparison to the quiet, unheralded
Ghandi-like diplomacy of one of Kashmir’s best-known in-surgents-turned-peacemakers — Yasin Malik.
Mr. Malik is chairman of the Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front and a leader of the All Parties Hurriyet Conference (APHC) that conglomerates Kashmir’s fractious insurgents. He was instrumental in persuading the hard-line APHC elements backed by Pakistan’s intelligence services to allow New Delhi’s olive branch to take root when former Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee stilled his security forces in the now well-chronicled “Ramadan cease-fire” in late summer and fall 2000.
On March 15, Mr. Malik took a page from Mahatma Ghandi’s playbook and showed up in New Delhi with 14 trunks packed with the “voice of Kashmiris” — 1.5 million individual signatures (twice the number of those who voted in Kashmir’s last elections) collected over two years that confirmed “the Kashmiri people’s verdict for peace and inclusion in the India-Pakistan dialogue.” It was a foundation stone for peace that nary a politician from Washington to New Delhi seemed to comprehend or acknowledge.
Resolving Kashmir should remain first and foremost about saving its ravaged people from extremists on both sides of the Line of Control dividing them today.
Mr. Malik’s ballots show how deeply Kashmiris want to be free from being caught between a rage defined on one side by Islamabad’s military paranoia and insecurity and on the other by the intransigent New Delhi civil authority’s insistence on ruling a Muslim population against its will.
It is time both India and Pakistan made the Kashmiri people the centerpiece of efforts to resolve the conflict, and to assert their most fundamental human right of all — freedom to determine their destiny. Mr. Malik’s consolidation of Kashmiri voices from every corner of the Himalayan state is the surest sign yet that a deep yearning for self-determination and the will to accept the responsibilities of free choice are in the hearts and souls of a majority of its residents.
Mr. Musharraf and Mr. Singh no longer can ignore these voices. And there may never be a better time in the India-Pakistan relationship — considered by most observers to be cresting — to use them to determine Kashmir’s destiny.
At the time of this writing, Mr. Singh is considering a meeting with APHC representatives during Mr. Musharraf’s visit, a sign the pragmatist Indian leader understands what Mr. Malik brought to his doorstep in those trunks.
View Entire StoryBy Peter Vincent Pry
Hardening infrastructure will be key to minimizing the threat

By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times
George W. Huguely V lied to friends about his whereabouts the night Yeardley Love was ...

By David Hood - The Washington Times
Reston-based LightSquared Inc. vowed Wednesday to continue its fight to establish a national wireless broadband ...

By Kristina Wong - The Washington Times
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta engaged in a testy back-and-forth with Rep. J. Randy Forbes over ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.

Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God