Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Forum: AARP and the Social Security crisis

One group, more than any other in America, bears primary responsibility for the developing financial crisis of Social Security — the AARP.

For four decades, the AARP has claimed to represent seniors. In its leadership role, this political behemoth ($20 million spent annually on lobbyists) is responsible for every major policy action on Social Security since the early 1960s.

AARP should be excoriated for enabling and creating the Social Security financial problems for which they now claim to have solutions. Unfortunately, AARP’s “solutions” are the very same bad policies that turned Social Security into a massive ticking debt bomb — tax increases, benefit cuts for millions of future retirees and continued spending of every cent of the Social Security Trust Fund.

Here’s the short list of how AARP specifically put America’s future generations in financial jeopardy:

Eighteen payroll tax increases: AARP’s repeated support for Social Security payroll tax increases has been devastating because (1) they hit working families hardest, (2) they actually suppress job and economic growth by slamming small businesses with higher costs, and (3) they perpetuate the illusion Social Security’s solution lies in American taxpayers giving government more of their hard-earned money.

Double taxes on seniors’ Social Security: Today some 16 million people over age 65 actually pay taxes on the Social Security benefits they worked to receive. In 1983 and 1984, AARP could have easily killed this tax, but instead enabled the fleecing of tens of millions of taxpayers way into the future.

Worse, the double tax was raised in 1993. Again, AARP could have stopped it but didn’t. Many seniors now pay higher tax rates on their Social Security benefits than many millionaires.

Perpetuating the pay-as-you-go scheme: In 1950, 16 workers supported each retiree under Social Security. That ratio plummeted over the next five decades under AARP’s watch. Today about three workers support each retiree; when our grandchildren are in their late 40s, there will only be two workers supporting each retiree.

This system is destined to cause untold distress for tens of millions of families. AARP has known the problem was growing and deepened the crisis.

Raiding the trust fund: Most Americans now know there is no money in the Social Security Trust Fund. For four decades, AARP has enabled unelected bureaucrats in Washington to treat the Social Security Fund as a sort of “slush fund.”

AARP has fought to keep this mountain of debt growing because it benefits financially from federal spending. In just the last 16 years, AARP appears to have taken more than $1 billion in federal grants. Why does an organization of 35 million members need federal funding?

Imagine for a moment if AARP had made the best interests of future generations their focus in 1983. Instead of helping enact multiple payroll tax increases, double taxes on Social Security benefits, arbitrary cuts in future benefits by raising the retirement age, and other benefit cuts, AARP could have supported ownership of Personal Retirement Accounts. What would have happened?

(1) American workers and their families would now own more than $7 trillion of personal wealth in their Personal Retirement Accounts and retirees would be protected.

(2) Retirees would have received better returns than promised — but not possible — under Social Security.

(3) The raid on the Social Security Trust Fund would have stopped.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held at the Marriott Wardman Park, Washington, DC, Thursday, February 9, 2012. The annual political conference draws thousands of supporters and prominent conservative figures. (Andrew Harnik / The Washington Times)

    Conservatives fancy the idea of a long nomination fight

    By Seth McLaughlin - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** U.S. Marine Sgt. Monica Perez (left) of San Diego helps Lance Cpl. Mary Shloss of Hammond, Ind., put on her head scarf before heading out on a patrol in the village of Khwaja Jamal in the Helmand province of Afghanistan in August 2009. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson, File)

    Pentagon to move women closer to front lines

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • A worker leaves with a moving box Wednesday at Solyndra in Fremont, Calif. The solar-panel manufacturer, which received a $535 million loan from the U.S. government, has announced layoffs of 1,100 workers and plans to file for bankruptcy. A weak economy and strong overseas competition have proved insurmountable. (Associated Press)

    Republicans accuse White House of Solyndra stonewall

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now

          Independent voices from the TWT Communities

          Payne-Full Living

          Join Matt on weekly adventures in all forms as he pushes past his comfort levels in an attempt to stimulate the body, mind and soul.