



HONOLULU — U.S. officials have been warning Taiwan that it must do more to prepare its own defense against a potential attack from China rather than rely largely on the United States — and that if it doesn’t, the United States may feel less obligated to come to its rescue.
Publicly, that warning has been delivered by officials of the American Institute in Taiwan, the quasi-official embassy in Taipei that functions in the absence of normal diplomatic relations, and two prominent Washington think tanks with ties to the Bush administration — the Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute.
Privately, U.S. officials said, that advice had been delivered by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld by way of retired senior U.S. military officers visiting Taiwan and by active-duty U.S. colonels who visit Taiwan to confer with Taiwanese officers.
“Some of the investments that Taiwan would like to make are not optimized for the defense of Taiwan,” said one senior officer who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
The U.S. pressure on Taiwan appears to be bipartisan and long in the making.
Former Defense Secretary William S. Cohen, a Republican who served under President Clinton, told an audience in Taiwan: “You cannot expect the American people to burden ourselves the way we are to carry out responsibilities for other countries if there is no corresponding effort being made for self-defense.”
In a research paper, Denny Roy, a specialist on U.S.-Taiwan relations at the Asia-Pacific Center for Security Studies in Honolulu, writes:
“Among Taiwan’s long-standing grievances with the United States are a perceived domineering U.S. attitude and suspicion that the Americans may use Taiwan for purposes not necessarily in Taiwan’s best interest.
“Many Americans, on the other hand, complain that Taiwan has been too slow to make difficult but essential changes in its defense policy.” Mr. Roy quoted Mr. Cohen in that paper.
This widening rift between Washington and Taiwan, over which China claims sovereignty, comes as Chinese President Hu Jintao prepares to visit Washington next month.
He is expected to repeat a message delivered by all visiting Chinese officials — that the future of Taiwan is the most sensitive issue between China and the United States.
Although Mr. Hu has proclaimed that China seeks to take over Taiwan by peaceful means, his government repeatedly has threatened to use military force if Taiwan declares formal independence.
The main point of contention between Washington and Taipei is a package of weapons offered by the United States that includes eight diesel-electric submarines, six Patriot anti-missile batteries, 12 P-3C anti-submarine aircraft and other items worth $15 billion to $18 billion.
The Bush administration presented that package in April 2001, but the proposal has languished ever since.
Taiwanese leader Chen Shui-bian, who belongs to the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), has urged lawmakers to approve funds for the purchase. But the legislature, controlled by the opposition Nationalist Party, has refused.
View Entire StoryBy Peter Vincent Pry
Hardening infrastructure will be key to minimizing the threat

By David Hood - The Washington Times
Reston-based LightSquared Inc. vowed Wednesday to continue its fight to establish a national wireless broadband ...

By Meredith Somers - The Washington Times
George W. Huguely V lied to friends about his whereabouts the night Yeardley Love was ...

By Kristina Wong - The Washington Times
Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta engaged in a testy back-and-forth with Rep. J. Randy Forbes ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Reflections on raising families in a holistic way -- with a focus on nutrition and alternative health.

Everyone has the divine rights as human beings because they were created in the image of God