




One of the dirty secrets of television news is that the producers who book pundits such as Armstrong Williams on their programs rarely ask the commentators about potential conflicts of interest.
The world learned last week that Mr. Williams, a conservative pundit who hosts syndicated TV and radio shows, was paid $240,000 to promote President Bush’s education policies through a $1 million federal contract with the Ketchum Inc. public relations firm.
He talked up the president’s No Child Left Behind initiative on his own TV and radio programs, but he also went on other programs to tout them. He never bothered to disclose this to the people who booked him on those shows.
Make no mistake: Mr. Williams should have voluntarily offered this information. His explanation as to why he didn’t — he said he doesn’t consider himself a journalist — just doesn’t fly.
But shouldn’t the TV bookers have asked him about potential conflicts regardless?
TV bookers often do a “pre-interview” with guests before they schedule them to appear on a show, but they rarely probe pundits whose views are well known.
“In the case of someone like Armstrong Williams, we have certain expectations that we know enough about them beforehand,” said Matthew Furman, a spokesman for CNN, where Mr. Williams discussed No Child Left Behind on Oct. 18.
Mr. Williams said none of the TV producers who booked him on their shows to discuss Mr. Bush’s education policies asked him if he had a potential conflict. Even if they had, he said he probably wouldn’t have mentioned his contract with Ketchum.
“I don’t consider myself a journalist. I’m a conservative Republican commentator. That’s the role I’m expected to fulfill when I go on TV,” he said.
Compounding the lack of vetting of TV guests are deadline pressures, which often force producers to simply flip their Rolodex to the names of commentators who can be relied upon to deliver a required sound bite.
This is why the same faces — think Donna Brazile and Linda Chavez, to name two — appear on the same shows again and again.
You might think that, until now, no one would have expected pundits to not conform to this most basic of journalistic ethics.
But some commentators have long since proved themselves squirrelly about disclosure.
George F. Will appeared on ABC in 1980 to praise former California Gov. Ronald Reagan’s performance in a debate with President Carter. Later,the world learned Mr. Will had coached Mr. Reagan before the debate.
Last fall, when James Carville and Paul Begala weren’t advising Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry, they were talking about his campaign as the co-hosts of CNN’s “Crossfire.”
View Entire StoryBy Julia A. Seymour
Planned Parenthood flap preceded by assault from anti-chemical activists

By Rich Campbell - The Washington Times
Imagine this: Peyton Manning coming out of the tunnel at FedEx Field this September, poised ...

By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times
When Lt. j.g. Timothy W. Dorsey fired his fighter jet’s missile at an Air Force ...

By Paige Winfield Cunningham - The Washington Times
Pointing to growing unease that President Obama’s proposed contraception coverage rule doesn’t protect religious freedom ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

A politically conservative and morally liberal Hebrew alpha male hunts left-wing vipers.

You don’t have to be a super-parent to make baby happy. Get pointers on parenting tips to make life easier.

An inside look at the world highlighting not only green issues affecting us all, but everything from green travel to green technology.