Inside the Beltway

Hillary and crew

“Maybe the Dems are trying to recruit Vito to run against himself next year.”

That’s all Craig Donner, press secretary to Rep. Vito J. Fossella can figure, after the Democratic National Committee mistakenly referred to the New York Republican as one of its “Democratic Leaders.”

“Or,” Mr. Donner quips, “it just might be part of that vast left-wing conspiracy.”

Democrats — and Republicans — have reason to be impressed with the congressman, who was first elected to Congress in a special election in 1997. A former New York City council member who represents Staten Island and Brooklyn, he’s been at the forefront in securing federal aid to enhance homeland security at home and across the country.

It was the congressman who also introduced successful legislation withholding U.S. funding to any United Nations commission headed by a nation on the State Department’s list of terror nations.

You may also recall he negotiated the agreement between the State Department and the United Nations requiring foreign diplomats to pay millions of dollars in unpaid parking fines.

Who better to quote?

Speaking of employing Republicans, the Democratic National Committee says it doesn’t need members of its own party to expand on accusations that White House senior aide Karl Rove revealed classified information in the Valerie Plame/CIA case.

Instead, they have issued a press release quoting Republicans, including President Bush’s father, former President Bush, who calls those who leak classified information the “most insidious of traitors.”

The Democrats conclude by quoting former Republican Party Chairman Ed Gillespie, who called the leak “worse than Watergate.”

Armed with notebooks

Tom Kilgannon, president of the Freedom Alliance, tells Inside the Beltway he was in New York last week to attend what we’ll call the U.N.’s small-arms conference.

“Since the U.N. can’t do anything easy, the official title of the conference is the ’Second Biennial Meeting of States to Consider the Implementation of the Programme of Action to Prevent, Combat and Eradicate the Illicit Trade in Small Arms and Light Weapons in All Its Aspects,’” Mr. Kilgannon notes.

The lead sponsor the event was the IANSA — the International Action Network on Small Arms, which describes itself as a “global movement against gun violence — more than 500 civil society organizations working in 100 countries to stop the proliferation and misuse of small arms and light weapons.”

While at the biennial meeting, Mr. Kilgannon got his hands on “Internal Talking Points” that the IANSA issued to its staff and partners. The document is stamped “FOR IANSA INTERNAL USE ONLY.”

Under “Tips for Working with Journalists,” it cites as Rule #5: “Treat reporters with respect even if they seem rude, unprepared or ill-informed.”

But our favorite is Rule #6: “Don’t try to please reporters or make them happy — they are not your friends.” (So much for the anti-gun lobby peddling stories to the New York Times).

Finally, at the bottom of the page there is a special message outlined so it can’t be missed: “Warning: Journalists from the gun lobby may be at the meeting.”

Out of ammo

Speaking of guns, the National Rifle Association has been pushing for congressional passage of “The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act,” aimed at prohibiting lawsuits that blame gun makers for the criminal misuse of their products.

Chris W. Cox, executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, says one major U.S. firearms maker has already informed the Pentagon that it may no longer be able to supply weapons required by the U.S. military and law enforcement agencies as a result of, as he phrases them, “frivolous lawsuits against the American firearms industry [that] have bled more than $250 million in legal-defense costs out of these legal businesses.”

“Several firearms manufacturers have already declared bankruptcy under this mountain of legal bills — and many more are teetering on the brink of financial ruin,” Mr. Cox notes.

Court jesters

The conservative’s fervent desire

Is for Ginsburg and Stevens and Breyer,

O’Connor and Souter,

And Kennedy, too, to

Announce that they plan to retire.

— F.R. Duplantier, obviously arguing why stop with just one Supreme Court retirement?

• John McCaslin, whose column is nationally syndicated, can be reached at 202/636-3284 or jmccaslin@washingtontimes.com.