Red-light cameras are a budget drag, officials say

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen
• Videos

By

Red-light cameras have been criticized as moneymakers masquerading as safety devices. But several jurisdictions predict their budgets will be better off when Virginia ends the pilot program this summer.

"We've probably lost $1 million over five years, and I hesitate to say lost," Bruce Taylor, Fairfax County's traffic-system program manager, said of the cameras. "When you look at societal costs, obviously it prevents people from getting hurt."

The cameras take pictures of cars that run lights at certain busy intersections. The license-plate number is used to identify the car's owner, who then gets a ticket in the mail.

Fairfax County has installed cameras at 15 locations over the past five years, at a cost of about $40,000 per camera. The county had to set up the infrastructure, including poles and sensors, and hire additional staff to administer the program.

During this time, Mr. Taylor said the county has seen a 60 percent decrease in red-light violations.

Having served as a volunteer paramedic in Loudoun County for seven years, Mr. Taylor saw firsthand some of the worst accidents resulting from the rush to make a light. He sees state lawmakers' decision not to renew the program -- ending it July 1 -- as "putting politics above people's lives."

"It's a great loss to the commonwealth," Mr. Taylor said.

Fairfax City was the first to install the cameras, and City Manager Bob Sisson said the infrastructure cost "hundreds of thousands" of dollars.

"We had to buy the cameras, buy the signal poles, cut the roads to put in the sensors," Mr. Sisson said. Fairfax City is one of the few jurisdictions to make a slight profit.

"It's almost a wash, expense versus revenue. The revenue from those fines is not critical to our operating," Mr. Sisson said.