


Montgomery County Public Schools have barred parents from sitting in on classes in which a new sex-education curriculum will be taught, despite an official schools policy that encourages parents to visit their children’s classrooms.
The policy states that parents are welcome to visit their child’s classroom with permission from school administrators. The policy says, “Classroom visits and conferences by parents and other persons in the school community are encouraged.”
Not this time.
Brian Edwards, a county schools spokesman, said the parents’ presence at the sex-ed classes would have a “chilling effect on the educational process.”
“If you’re in a classroom and you want to have a frank discussion among your peers, with whom you’ve developed trust, and you’re going to have Johnny Smith’s mother sitting in the corner, you’re not going to be as honest,” he said.
Parents who are concerned about the new curriculum because they think it favors a homosexual agenda and encourages promiscuity said keeping them out of the classroom when the new sex-ed curriculum is being taught is “a big mistake.”
“There isn’t anything in the school curriculum that parents should not be able to go and hear for themselves,” said Michelle Turner, president of Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum (CRC). “If the school feels that parents shouldn’t be in the classroom, then that’s a red flag for parents.”
Russ Henke, the county’s health education coordinator, said parents are usually shut out of classrooms.
“There are particular times of the year, during National Education Week, that we invite the parents in, but it’s not something we have as far as a general open classroom,” he said.
In November, the county school board voted unanimously to approve a tryout of the new curriculum in three high schools and three middle schools.
The curriculum, which was slightly revised last month, defines one’s sexual identity as including gender identity, which is “a person’s internal sense of knowing whether he or she is male or female.” The instruction also includes the statement that “most experts in the field have concluded that sexual orientation is not a choice.”
Also, households with same-sex parents are identified as one type of nine families. Next to that listing, a new phrase has been inserted as instruction to teachers — not students. It reads in parentheses: “This should not be interpreted as same-sex marriage.”
An explicit warning to teachers also has been added in a section that discusses sexual identity and orientation.
“No additional information, interpretation or examples are to be provided by the teacher,” the warning states.
Mrs. Turner said she was in favor of parents sitting in on class sessions that their children don’t attend.
View Entire StoryBy H. Leighton Steward
Fantasy replaces reality in Obama's green economy

By Luke Rosiak - The Washington Times
When Newt Gingrich’s campaign disclosed in October it planned to pay the candidate $70,000 for ...

By David Hill - The Washington Times
The House voted Friday night to approve Gov. Martin O’Malley’s same-sex marriage bill, sending the ...

By Stephen Dinan - The Washington Times
Acting with striking bipartisanship, Congress on Friday passed a full-year extension of the payroll tax ...
Independent voices from the TWT Communities

Children around the globe are too often silent. From victims of abuse - physical, mental, and sexual to those whose lives embrace joy, their stories are many and need to be heard.

How does our 50th state view D.C. politics?

Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.