Prober turns over oil-food papers to Congress

• Article
• Comments ()
• Click-2-Listen

By

A senior investigator who resigned in protest from the U.N.-appointed panel probing the oil-for-food scandal has given Congress internal documents from the inquiry that are thought to be harshly critical of U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan.

The delivery poses more problems for the embattled Mr. Annan and escalates the open feud between U.S. lawmakers and the U.N. probe headed by former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker for control of the investigation.

Robert Parton, a former FBI agent and the top investigator with the United Nations' $30 million oil-for-food investigation, delivered at least a half-dozen boxes of documents to comply with a subpoena issued last week by the House International Relations Committee.

Committee Chairman Henry J. Hyde, Illinois Republican, praised Mr. Parton for complying and warned Mr. Volcker's panel against seeking retribution for his cooperation.

"It is my hope and expectation that neither the United Nations nor the [Volcker] inquiry will attempt to sanction Mr. Parton for complying with a lawful subpoena," Mr. Hyde said yesterday.

Mr. Hyde and committee sources refused to characterize the material provided by Mr. Parton, saying investigators are still going through it.

But Mr. Parton and Miranda Duncan, another senior investigator hired by Mr. Volcker, resigned last month from the investigation to protest what they said was a watered-down account of Mr. Annan's role in the Iraq oil-for-food scandal.

Mr. Volcker's March 29 report cleared the secretary-general of the central charge of steering a key oil-for-food contract to a Swiss company that employed his son, although it did fault the U.N. leader for a superficial investigation of the charges once they came to light.

Mr. Annan immediately declared himself "exonerated" on the most serious charges against him, a characterization that Mr. Volcker and others have disputed.

It is thought that among the subpoenaed material turned over to the House committee were earlier drafts of the public report that took a much tougher line on Mr. Annan and his numerous contacts with the Swiss contractor before and after the award was made.