Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

GOP senator faults Bush in filibuster deal

Sen. Lindsay Graham, the South Carolina Republican who helped craft the compromise that effectively scuttles several of President Bush’s judicial nominees and saves others, said he hopes the White House has learned a lesson.

“The White House has to more closely collaborate with the Senate,” Mr. Graham said, adding that if Mr. Bush had employed a little more personal charm and politics, he might have had his way.

“If we talk more, we’ll get a better result,” Mr. Graham said. “Talking helps. This president is a wonderful person to speak to in person. I think this gives [Mr. Bush] a fresh start.”

Manuel Miranda, director of the National Coalition to End Judicial Filibusters and former Senate Judiciary Committee staffer, said Mr. Bush did not work hard enough to get votes for all his nominees, and didn’t keep Republicans in line and defeat the minority Democrats.

“This is a loss for the White House bigger than any loss on Social Security,” Mr. Miranda said. “[The White House] did not weigh in and every president in the future has been damaged.

“These were the president’s nominees and the presidency’s prerogative,” he said. “The White House needed to invest action, not just words.”

White House spokesman Scott McClellan conceded that the president didn’t get all that he wanted — and he will continue to push for the full Senate to vote on all his judicial nominees — but that Mr. Bush is generally pleased with the development.

“These are nominees that have waited for a number of years to receive an up-or-down vote, and now they’re going to get one,” Mr. McClellan said. “We consider that to be real progress, and so we’re pleased that the Senate is moving forward on these judicial nominees.”

Conservative activists, however, were still fuming yesterday, and said the White House should share in the blame for a deal that still leaves open the possibility that the Democrats will filibuster future Supreme Court nominees.

“I wish the president had done more,” said Eagle Forum President Phyllis Schlafly. “He has the biggest megaphone of all.”

Mrs. Schlafly said much of the press repeated, without challenge, the Democrats’ line that the change in the rules on filibustering judicial candidates would have violated more than 200 years of Senate tradition.

“That Democrat line was a lie,” Mrs. Schlafly said, adding that the president could have done more to counteract that.

She also said that Mr. Bush should have been able to keep at least two Republican senators, Mr. Graham and Mike DeWine of Ohio, from deserting the leadership and joining Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, on the side of a filibuster compromise.

The Monday agreement between seven Republicans and seven Democrats averted a showdown over judicial filibusters. The Democrats agreed to votes on three of the five blocked nominees in exchange for the Republicans dropping support of a rules change to allow a floor vote on all the nominees.

American Conservative Union Chairman David A. Keene called the compromise “a direct assault on prerogatives of the president of United States.”

Story Continues →

View Entire Story
Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like
  • Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) speaks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held at the Marriott Wardman Park, Washington, DC, Thursday, February 9, 2012. The annual political conference draws thousands of supporters and prominent conservative figures. (Andrew Harnik / The Washington Times)

    Conservatives fancy the idea of a long nomination fight

    By Seth McLaughlin - The Washington Times

  • ** FILE ** U.S. Marine Sgt. Monica Perez (left) of San Diego helps Lance Cpl. Mary Shloss of Hammond, Ind., put on her head scarf before heading out on a patrol in the village of Khwaja Jamal in the Helmand province of Afghanistan in August 2009. (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson, File)

    Pentagon to move women closer to front lines

    By Rowan Scarborough - The Washington Times

  • A worker leaves with a moving box Wednesday at Solyndra in Fremont, Calif. The solar-panel manufacturer, which received a $535 million loan from the U.S. government, has announced layoffs of 1,100 workers and plans to file for bankruptcy. A weak economy and strong overseas competition have proved insurmountable. (Associated Press)

    Republicans accuse White House of Solyndra stonewall

    By Jim McElhatton - The Washington Times

  • In Case You Missed It
    Talk of the Web
    Happening Now